Independence in Three Andean Novels: Mientras llega el día, La tragedia del Generalísimo y Bolívar. Delirio y epopeya

The author examines three novels that read History through new approaches and suggest another sense of the heroic. La tragedia del Generalísimo, by Denzil Romero, evokes Francisco de Miranda, a highly educated criollo, theorist of the Independence process. Riera emphasizes the hero’s godly features,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Riera Rodríguez, Gloria
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2009
País:Ecuador
Institución:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
Repositorio:Revista Andina de Letras y Estudios Culturales
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/925
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/kipus/article/view/925
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Nueva novela histórica
Historia
Colombia
Venezuela
Ecuador
Independencia
Simón Bolívar
Francisco de Miranda
mestizo
New historical novel
History
Independence
Descripción
Sumario:The author examines three novels that read History through new approaches and suggest another sense of the heroic. La tragedia del Generalísimo, by Denzil Romero, evokes Francisco de Miranda, a highly educated criollo, theorist of the Independence process. Riera emphasizes the hero’s godly features, his doubts, eccentricities, and his transition from supporting realism to the defense of the Spanish American cause. Mientras llega el día, by Juan Valdano, sees Independence from a counterhegemonic point of view. Riera points out the concept that the events of 1810, in Quito, were not a demonstration of criollo nationalism but of the presence of a heterogenous social-cultural collective, the mestizos, which were trying to overcome long-standing injustice. Bolívar. Delirio y epopeya, biography by Víctor Paz, deals with myth without denying historical sources. The author analyzes sanitydelusion and lucidity-madness as traits that would define Bolívar, and the idea of emancipationas a wish for land ownership, granted through birth but denied by blood heritage. Therefore, Bolívar wouldn’t be the sole protagonist, even though he may remain as a cultural paradigm able to legitimize current assumptions of Anticolonialism.