Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive
The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of four resin-based composite materials to a silicate-based cement using a “no-wait” universal bond with self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (ER) modes. Acrylic blocks (n=80, 2mm depth, 5mm diameter central hole) were prepared. The...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Costa Rica |
| Institución: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/47842 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/47842 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Biodentine; Self-etch adhesive; Shear bond strength. Biodentine; Adhesivo autocurado; Resistencia adhesiva a la cizalla. |
| id |
CR_fec5a5fcd67634e7ec7dc5e2efc008fa |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/47842 |
| network_acronym_str |
CR |
| network_name_str |
Costa Rica |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive Influencia del modo de grabado y del tipo de resina en la resistencia adhesiva al Biodentine utilizando un adhesivo universal tipo "no-wait" |
| title |
Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive |
| spellingShingle |
Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive Sarialioğlu Güngör, Ayça Biodentine; Self-etch adhesive; Shear bond strength. Biodentine; Adhesivo autocurado; Resistencia adhesiva a la cizalla. |
| title_short |
Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive |
| title_full |
Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive |
| title_fullStr |
Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive |
| title_sort |
Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal Adhesive |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Sarialioğlu Güngör, Ayça Uysal, Betül Aycan |
| author |
Sarialioğlu Güngör, Ayça |
| author_facet |
Sarialioğlu Güngör, Ayça Uysal, Betül Aycan |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Uysal, Betül Aycan |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Biodentine; Self-etch adhesive; Shear bond strength. Biodentine; Adhesivo autocurado; Resistencia adhesiva a la cizalla. |
| topic |
Biodentine; Self-etch adhesive; Shear bond strength. Biodentine; Adhesivo autocurado; Resistencia adhesiva a la cizalla. |
| description |
The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of four resin-based composite materials to a silicate-based cement using a “no-wait” universal bond with self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (ER) modes. Acrylic blocks (n=80, 2mm depth, 5mm diameter central hole) were prepared. The holes were filled with BiodentineTM (BD) and divided into 4 main groups (n=20) according to the composite resin type used: Group FZ250: FiltekTM Z250 Universal Restorative (microhybrid), Group SDR: SDR Plus U Bulk Fill Flowable (low-viscosity bulk-fill), Group FBP: FiltekTM Bulk Fill Posterior (high-viscosity bulk-fill), Group EF: EsFlow™ Universal Flowable Composite (nanohybrid). A ‘no-wait’ universal bond (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick) was used for bonding application. Then each group was divided into 2 subgroups according to the etching mode applied (ER and SE). SBSs were measured and stereomicroscope was used to identify the failure modes. Selected samples of fracture surfaces were imaged by SEM. Tukey’s post-hoc and One-way ANOVA tests were used to analyze data. There were statistically significant differences among the composite groups (p<0.05). When SDR showed the highest bond strength values in SE (17.13 ± 2.98 MPa) mode, FBP showed the lowest bond strength values in ER (8.89 ± 2.46 MPa) mode. The mean SBS was not different between the SE and ER modes (p> 0.05). The SBS of BD to the resin composites depends on the composite type but application of the ‘no-wait’ universal bond in different etching modes is regardless of the SBS of BD to resin composites. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-22 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article artículo original http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/47842 10.15517/ijds.2021.47842 |
| url |
https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/47842 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.15517/ijds.2021.47842 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/47842/47523 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/47842/47524 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/47842/47525 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 acceso abierto http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 acceso abierto http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Costa Rica |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Costa Rica |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2022): (September-December) Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences; 36-47 Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences; Vol. 24 Núm. 3 (2022): (September-December) Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences; 36-47 2215-3411 1659-1046 10.15517/ijds.2022 reponame:Portal de Revistas UCR instname:Universidad de Costa Rica instacron:UCR |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Costa Rica |
| instacron_str |
UCR |
| institution |
UCR |
| reponame_str |
Portal de Revistas UCR |
| collection |
Portal de Revistas UCR |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Portal de Revistas UCR - Universidad de Costa Rica |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
jorge.polanco@ucr.ac.cr |
| _version_ |
1849325445188681728 |
| spelling |
Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a “No-Wait” Universal AdhesiveInfluencia del modo de grabado y del tipo de resina en la resistencia adhesiva al Biodentine utilizando un adhesivo universal tipo "no-wait"Sarialioğlu Güngör, AyçaUysal, Betül AycanBiodentine; Self-etch adhesive; Shear bond strength.Biodentine; Adhesivo autocurado; Resistencia adhesiva a la cizalla.The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of four resin-based composite materials to a silicate-based cement using a “no-wait” universal bond with self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (ER) modes. Acrylic blocks (n=80, 2mm depth, 5mm diameter central hole) were prepared. The holes were filled with BiodentineTM (BD) and divided into 4 main groups (n=20) according to the composite resin type used: Group FZ250: FiltekTM Z250 Universal Restorative (microhybrid), Group SDR: SDR Plus U Bulk Fill Flowable (low-viscosity bulk-fill), Group FBP: FiltekTM Bulk Fill Posterior (high-viscosity bulk-fill), Group EF: EsFlow™ Universal Flowable Composite (nanohybrid). A ‘no-wait’ universal bond (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick) was used for bonding application. Then each group was divided into 2 subgroups according to the etching mode applied (ER and SE). SBSs were measured and stereomicroscope was used to identify the failure modes. Selected samples of fracture surfaces were imaged by SEM. Tukey’s post-hoc and One-way ANOVA tests were used to analyze data. There were statistically significant differences among the composite groups (p<0.05). When SDR showed the highest bond strength values in SE (17.13 ± 2.98 MPa) mode, FBP showed the lowest bond strength values in ER (8.89 ± 2.46 MPa) mode. The mean SBS was not different between the SE and ER modes (p> 0.05). The SBS of BD to the resin composites depends on the composite type but application of the ‘no-wait’ universal bond in different etching modes is regardless of the SBS of BD to resin composites.El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la resistencia de adhesión al cizallamiento (SBS) de cuatro resinas con un cemento a base de silicato utilizando una adhesivo universal "no-wait" de autograbado (SE) y grabado y lavado (ER). Se prepararon bloques acrílicos (n=80, de 2mm de profundidad y un agujero central de 5mm de diámetro). Los agujeros se rellenaron con BiodentineTM (BD) y se dividieron en 4 grupos principales (n=20) según el tipo de resina compuesta utilizada: Grupo FZ250: FiltekTM Z250 Universal Restorative (microhíbrido), Grupo SDR: SDR Plus U Bulk Fill Flowable (bulk-fill de baja viscosidad), Grupo FBP: FiltekTM Bulk Fill Posterior (bulk-fill de alta viscosidad), Grupo EF: EsFlow™ Universal Flowable Composite (nanohíbrido). Para la aplicación de la adhesión se utilizó un adhesivo universal "no-wait" (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick). A continuación, cada grupo se dividió en 2 subgrupos según el modo de grabado aplicado (ER y SE). Se midieron los SBS y se utilizó el estereomicroscopio para identificar los modos de fallo. Las muestras seleccionadas de las superficies de fractura se analizaron mediante SEM. Se utilizaron las pruebas post-hoc de Tukey y ANOVA de una vía para analizar los datos. Hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos de composites (p<0,05). Cuando la SDR mostró los valores más altos de resistencia a la adhesión en el modo SE (17,13±2,98 MPa), la FBP mostró los valores más bajos de resistencia a la adhesión en el modo ER (8,89±2,46 MPa). La SBS media no fue diferente entre los modos SE y ER (p>0,05). La SBS de la BD a los composites de resina depende del tipo de composite, pero la aplicación de la unión universal "no-wait" en los diferentes modos de grabado es independiente de la SBS de la BD a los composites de resina.Universidad de Costa Rica2021-07-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticleartículo originalhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/4784210.15517/ijds.2021.47842Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2022): (September-December) Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences; 36-47Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences; Vol. 24 Núm. 3 (2022): (September-December) Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences; 36-472215-34111659-104610.15517/ijds.2022reponame:Portal de Revistas UCRinstname:Universidad de Costa Ricainstacron:UCRenghttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/47842/47523https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/47842/47524https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/47842/47525Derechos de autor 2022 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-09-12T20:35:29Zoai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/47842Portal de revistashttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/Universidadhttp://www.ucr.ac.crhttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/index/oaijorge.polanco@ucr.ac.crCosta RicaNo aplicaNo aplicaNo aplicaopendoar:2025-08-13T10:44:25.603Portal de Revistas UCR - Universidad de Costa Ricafalse |
| score |
15,812455 |