The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.

The objectiveof this work was to evaluate the capacity of Trichodermasp., Metarrhizium anisopliae and endophytic bacteria ofT. cucumeris (Frank) Donk under fi eld conditions, for thebiological control of web blight (T. cucumeris) in beans.Applications of Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma sp. (Strain2-V...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Rodríguez-Quiel, Emigdio, Montenegro-Alonso, Ana Priscilla, Ureta-Reyas, José Carlos, Pitty-Suira, Norberto, González-Guevara, Francisco, Muñoz-Fuentes, Jorge
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2012
País:Costa Rica
Recursos:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/11792
Acesso em linha:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/11792
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Trichoderma
Metarrhizium
Bacillus subtilis.
id CR_a5c8eea2bcc412e06fde24ade10fde4c
oai_identifier_str oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/11792
network_acronym_str CR
network_name_str Costa Rica
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.
Combate biológico de la mustia hilachosa (Thanatephorus cucumeris) en el frijol en Panamá
title The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.
spellingShingle The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.
Rodríguez-Quiel, Emigdio
Trichoderma
Metarrhizium
Bacillus subtilis.
Trichoderma
Metarrhizium
Bacillus subtilis.
title_short The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.
title_full The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.
title_fullStr The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.
title_full_unstemmed The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.
title_sort The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rodríguez-Quiel, Emigdio
Montenegro-Alonso, Ana Priscilla
Ureta-Reyas, José Carlos
Pitty-Suira, Norberto
González-Guevara, Francisco
Muñoz-Fuentes, Jorge
author Rodríguez-Quiel, Emigdio
author_facet Rodríguez-Quiel, Emigdio
Montenegro-Alonso, Ana Priscilla
Ureta-Reyas, José Carlos
Pitty-Suira, Norberto
González-Guevara, Francisco
Muñoz-Fuentes, Jorge
author_role author
author2 Montenegro-Alonso, Ana Priscilla
Ureta-Reyas, José Carlos
Pitty-Suira, Norberto
González-Guevara, Francisco
Muñoz-Fuentes, Jorge
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Trichoderma
Metarrhizium
Bacillus subtilis.
Trichoderma
Metarrhizium
Bacillus subtilis.
topic Trichoderma
Metarrhizium
Bacillus subtilis.
Trichoderma
Metarrhizium
Bacillus subtilis.
description The objectiveof this work was to evaluate the capacity of Trichodermasp., Metarrhizium anisopliae and endophytic bacteria ofT. cucumeris (Frank) Donk under fi eld conditions, for thebiological control of web blight (T. cucumeris) in beans.Applications of Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma sp. (Strain2-Villa Margarita), Trichoderma sp. (Strain 1-Colombia) andM. anisopliae (Colombia) at concentration of 2 x 107 conidia/ml of water), B. subtilis at rates of 0.335, 0.670, 1.005 and1.340 g ai / ml of water + 36 g ai Chlorothalonil /ha, benomyl50 WP with doses of 250 g ai / ha and a control treatment wereconducted. Results revealed high differences (P ≤ 0.0003)between treatments; the treatment with lower severity was M.anisopliae, followed by B. subtilis with 1,340 g ai /ml of water+ Chlorothalonil at 36 g ai/ha with 11.87% and B. subtilisto 0,335 g ai /l of water + Chlorothalonil at 36 g ai/ha, with15.0%. The treatments affected to the greatest degree were B.subtilis with 0,670 g ai/l of water + Chlorothalonil with 36g ai/ha, Trichoderma sp. (Strain 2-Villa Margarita) and thecontrol treatment with 26.2%, 22.25% and 21.85% of severity,respectively. The regression equation for the experiment Y =2502.91-13.021* Sev, was signifi cant and indicated lossesof 13.02 kg for each percent increase of the disease. Themarginal analysis revealed that the treatment with highest gainwas M. anisopliae, recording a net profi t of 28.34%.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-06-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Article
artículo original
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/11792
10.15517/am.v23i1.11792
url https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/11792
identifier_str_mv 10.15517/am.v23i1.11792
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/11792/11114
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Costa Rica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Costa Rica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Agronomía Mesoamericana; 2012: Agronomía Mesoamericana: Vol. 23, Issue 1 (January-June); 13-20
Agronomía Mesoamericana; 2012: Agronomía Mesoamericana: Vol 23, No 1 (Enero-junio); 13-20
Agronomía Mesoamericana; 2012: Agronomía Mesoamericana: Vol 23, No 1 (Enero-junio); 13-20
2215-3608
1021-7444
reponame:Portal de Revistas UCR
instname:Universidad de Costa Rica
instacron:UCR
instname_str Universidad de Costa Rica
instacron_str UCR
institution UCR
reponame_str Portal de Revistas UCR
collection Portal de Revistas UCR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Portal de Revistas UCR - Universidad de Costa Rica
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jorge.polanco@ucr.ac.cr
_version_ 1849325402354352128
spelling The biological control of web blight (Thanatephorus cucumeris) in common bean in Panama.Combate biológico de la mustia hilachosa (Thanatephorus cucumeris) en el frijol en PanamáRodríguez-Quiel, EmigdioMontenegro-Alonso, Ana PriscillaUreta-Reyas, José CarlosPitty-Suira, NorbertoGonzález-Guevara, FranciscoMuñoz-Fuentes, JorgeTrichodermaMetarrhiziumBacillus subtilis.TrichodermaMetarrhiziumBacillus subtilis.The objectiveof this work was to evaluate the capacity of Trichodermasp., Metarrhizium anisopliae and endophytic bacteria ofT. cucumeris (Frank) Donk under fi eld conditions, for thebiological control of web blight (T. cucumeris) in beans.Applications of Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma sp. (Strain2-Villa Margarita), Trichoderma sp. (Strain 1-Colombia) andM. anisopliae (Colombia) at concentration of 2 x 107 conidia/ml of water), B. subtilis at rates of 0.335, 0.670, 1.005 and1.340 g ai / ml of water + 36 g ai Chlorothalonil /ha, benomyl50 WP with doses of 250 g ai / ha and a control treatment wereconducted. Results revealed high differences (P ≤ 0.0003)between treatments; the treatment with lower severity was M.anisopliae, followed by B. subtilis with 1,340 g ai /ml of water+ Chlorothalonil at 36 g ai/ha with 11.87% and B. subtilisto 0,335 g ai /l of water + Chlorothalonil at 36 g ai/ha, with15.0%. The treatments affected to the greatest degree were B.subtilis with 0,670 g ai/l of water + Chlorothalonil with 36g ai/ha, Trichoderma sp. (Strain 2-Villa Margarita) and thecontrol treatment with 26.2%, 22.25% and 21.85% of severity,respectively. The regression equation for the experiment Y =2502.91-13.021* Sev, was signifi cant and indicated lossesof 13.02 kg for each percent increase of the disease. Themarginal analysis revealed that the treatment with highest gainwas M. anisopliae, recording a net profi t of 28.34%.El objetivo del presente trabajo fue determinar la capacidadbiocontroladora de hongos y bacteria endofíticos en T.cucumeris (Frank) Donk en condiciones de campo. Seevaluó la aplicación de Trichoderma sp. (Cepa 2-FincaMargarita), Trichoderma sp. (Cepa 1-Colombia) y M.anisopliae (Colombia) en concentración de 2 x 107 conidias/ml de agua); B. subtilis a razón de 0,335; 0,670; 1,005 y1,340 g i.a./l agua + Clorotalonil 36 g i.a. /ha; Benomil 50WP en dosis de 250 g i.a./ha y el testigo absoluto. Hubosignificancia (P≤0,0003) entre los tratamientos, la de menorseveridad de T. cucumeris se dio con la adición de M.anisopliae, seguido de B. subtilis con 1340 g i.a./l agua +Clorotalonil 36 g i.a/ha con 11,87% y Bacillus subtilis a0,335 g i.a./l agua + Clorotalonil 36 g i.a/ha con 15,0%. Lostratamientos donde hubo mayor severidad fueron B. subtilis0,670 g i.a./l agua + Clorotalonil 36 g i.a/ha, Trichodermasp. (Cepa 2-Finca Margarita) y el testigo absoluto con26,2; 22,25% y 21,85% de severidad, respectivamente. Laecuación de regresión para el experimento Y=2502,91-13,021*Sev, fue signifi cativa e indicó pérdidas de 13,02 kgpor cada uno por ciento de incremento de la enfermedad. Enel análisis marginal el tratamiento con mayor ganancia fueM. anisopliae, con un beneficio neto de 28,34%.Universidad de Costa Rica2012-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticleartículo originalhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/1179210.15517/am.v23i1.11792Agronomía Mesoamericana; 2012: Agronomía Mesoamericana: Vol. 23, Issue 1 (January-June); 13-20 Agronomía Mesoamericana; 2012: Agronomía Mesoamericana: Vol 23, No 1 (Enero-junio); 13-20Agronomía Mesoamericana; 2012: Agronomía Mesoamericana: Vol 23, No 1 (Enero-junio); 13-202215-36081021-7444reponame:Portal de Revistas UCRinstname:Universidad de Costa Ricainstacron:UCRspahttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/11792/11114acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-06-16T13:51:09Zoai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/11792Portal de revistashttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/Universidadhttp://www.ucr.ac.crhttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/index/oaijorge.polanco@ucr.ac.crCosta RicaNo aplicaNo aplicaNo aplicaopendoar:2025-08-13T10:28:39.733Portal de Revistas UCR - Universidad de Costa Ricafalse
score 15,811543