Peer Reviews in Scientific Journals: Recommendations from ODOVTOS

The editorial process of a journal, specifically peer review, validates the scientific publication supported by the experience and knowledge of the reviewers. However, despite the fact that there are programs that instruct members of the scientific community in research, there are few training tools...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Reyes-Carmona, Jessie
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:Costa Rica
Institución:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/46343
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/46343
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Arbitration; Peer review; Editorial process; Scientific publication.
Arbitraje; Revisión por pares; Proceso editorial; Publicación científica.
Descripción
Sumario:The editorial process of a journal, specifically peer review, validates the scientific publication supported by the experience and knowledge of the reviewers. However, despite the fact that there are programs that instruct members of the scientific community in research, there are few training tools to participate in the arbitration of a manuscript. The purpose of this article was to present a guide with a series of recommendations on how a scientific article should be peer-reviewed. A synopsis of recommendations and criteria is presented and will be used by the reviewers of Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences as a reference to support their work.