The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic review

In this work, the narrative or traditional review article is analyzed as an important and valuable source of information for scientific research, both in natural sciences and social sciences. In this sense, questions were raised regarding its essential characteristics, its difference with another re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Arias-Odón, Fidias
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:Costa Rica
Institución:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/59584
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/eciencias/article/view/59584
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:scientific article
narrative review
traditional review
scientific evidence
research validity
artículo científico
revisión narrativa
revisión tradicional
evidencia científica
validez de la investigación
artigo científico
revisão narrativa
revisão tradicional
validade
evidência científica
id CR_305c52ddc8c8c19a4e4884b742618102
oai_identifier_str oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/59584
network_acronym_str CR
network_name_str Costa Rica
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic review
El artículo de revisión narrativa: nivel de evidencia y validez científica. Revisión semi-sistemática
title The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic review
spellingShingle The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic review
Arias-Odón, Fidias
scientific article
narrative review
traditional review
scientific evidence
research validity
artículo científico
revisión narrativa
revisión tradicional
evidencia científica
validez de la investigación
artigo científico
revisão narrativa
revisão tradicional
validade
evidência científica
title_short The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic review
title_full The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic review
title_fullStr The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic review
title_sort The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic review
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arias-Odón, Fidias
author Arias-Odón, Fidias
author_facet Arias-Odón, Fidias
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv scientific article
narrative review
traditional review
scientific evidence
research validity
artículo científico
revisión narrativa
revisión tradicional
evidencia científica
validez de la investigación
artigo científico
revisão narrativa
revisão tradicional
validade
evidência científica
topic scientific article
narrative review
traditional review
scientific evidence
research validity
artículo científico
revisión narrativa
revisión tradicional
evidencia científica
validez de la investigación
artigo científico
revisão narrativa
revisão tradicional
validade
evidência científica
description In this work, the narrative or traditional review article is analyzed as an important and valuable source of information for scientific research, both in natural sciences and social sciences. In this sense, questions were raised regarding its essential characteristics, its difference with another review modality, specifically, the systematic review, and with another very different genre such as the essay. In addition, questions are asked about the level of evidence and scientific validity of the narrative review. The method used to answer the questions posed was the semi-systematic review with a qualitative approach. The most significant result reveals the validity and importance of the narrative review as a complement to other types of review, given its usefulness in the compilation of dispersed information, its integrated and summarized presentation, and its contribution to the detection of knowledge gaps for research. It is concluded that the degree of evidence and scientific validity of the narrative review article is determined by the branch of science in which it is developed, as well as by the research paradigm and approach assumed.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Article
artículo original
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/eciencias/article/view/59584
10.15517/eci.v15i1.59584
url https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/eciencias/article/view/59584
identifier_str_mv 10.15517/eci.v15i1.59584
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/eciencias/article/view/59584/63057
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Fidias Arias-Odón
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Fidias Arias-Odón
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Costa Rica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Costa Rica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv e-Ciencias de la Información; Volume 15, Issue 1: January-June 2025 (in progress)
e-Ciencias de la Información; Volumen 15, número 1: enero-junio 2025 (en progreso)
e-Ciencias de la Información; Volumen 15, número 1: enero-junio 2025 (en progreso)
1659-4142
reponame:Portal de Revistas UCR
instname:Universidad de Costa Rica
instacron:UCR
instname_str Universidad de Costa Rica
instacron_str UCR
institution UCR
reponame_str Portal de Revistas UCR
collection Portal de Revistas UCR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Portal de Revistas UCR - Universidad de Costa Rica
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jorge.polanco@ucr.ac.cr
_version_ 1849325329146970112
spelling The narrative review article: level of evidence and validity scientific. Semi-systematic reviewEl artículo de revisión narrativa: nivel de evidencia y validez científica. Revisión semi-sistemáticaArias-Odón, Fidias scientific articlenarrative reviewtraditional reviewscientific evidenceresearch validityartículo científicorevisión narrativarevisión tradicionalevidencia científicavalidez de la investigaciónartigo científicorevisão narrativarevisão tradicionalvalidadeevidência científicaIn this work, the narrative or traditional review article is analyzed as an important and valuable source of information for scientific research, both in natural sciences and social sciences. In this sense, questions were raised regarding its essential characteristics, its difference with another review modality, specifically, the systematic review, and with another very different genre such as the essay. In addition, questions are asked about the level of evidence and scientific validity of the narrative review. The method used to answer the questions posed was the semi-systematic review with a qualitative approach. The most significant result reveals the validity and importance of the narrative review as a complement to other types of review, given its usefulness in the compilation of dispersed information, its integrated and summarized presentation, and its contribution to the detection of knowledge gaps for research. It is concluded that the degree of evidence and scientific validity of the narrative review article is determined by the branch of science in which it is developed, as well as by the research paradigm and approach assumed.En este trabajo se analiza el artículo de revisión narrativa o tradicional como una importante y valiosa fuente de información para la investigación científica, tanto en ciencias naturales como en ciencias sociales. En este sentido, se plantearon preguntas en torno a sus características esenciales, su diferencia con otra modalidad de revisión, específicamente, la revisión sistemática, y con otro género muy distinto como el ensayo. Además, se interroga acerca del nivel de evidencia y validez científica de la revisión narrativa. El método empleado para responder las preguntas planteadas fue la revisión semi-sistemática de enfoque cualitativo. El resultado más significativo revela la validez e importancia de la revisión narrativa como complemento de otros tipos de revisiones, dada su utilidad en la compilación de información dispersa, su presentación integrada y resumida, así como su aporte en la detección de brechas de conocimiento para la investigación. Se concluye que el grado de evidencia y validez científica del artículo de revisión narrativa está determinada por la rama de la ciencia en la que se desarrolla, así como por el paradigma y enfoque de investigación asumido. Neste trabalho, o artigo de revisão narrativo ou tradicional é analisado como uma importante e valiosa fonte de informação para a pesquisa científica, tanto nas ciências naturais como nas ciências sociais. Nesse sentido, foram levantadas questões sobre suas características essenciais, sua diferença com outra modalidade de revisão, especificamente, a revisão sistemática, e com outro gênero muito diferente como o ensaio. Além disso, são feitas perguntas sobre o nível de evidência e a validade científica da revisão narrativa. O método utilizado para responder às questões colocadas foi a revisão semisistemática com abordagem qualitativa. Os resultados permitiram caracterizar a revisão narrativa e resgatar seu nível de evidência e validade científica. Conclui-se que o grau de evidência e validade científica do artigo de revisão narrativa é determinado pelo ramo da ciência em que é desenvolvido, bem como pelo paradigma de investigação e abordagem assumida. Palavras-chave: artigo científico, revisão narrativa, revisão tradicional, validade, evidência científica.Universidad de Costa Rica2025-01-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticleartículo originalhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/eciencias/article/view/5958410.15517/eci.v15i1.59584e-Ciencias de la Información; Volume 15, Issue 1: January-June 2025 (in progress) e-Ciencias de la Información; Volumen 15, número 1: enero-junio 2025 (en progreso) e-Ciencias de la Información; Volumen 15, número 1: enero-junio 2025 (en progreso) 1659-4142reponame:Portal de Revistas UCRinstname:Universidad de Costa Ricainstacron:UCRspahttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/eciencias/article/view/59584/63057Derechos de autor 2025 Fidias Arias-Odónhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-01-21T19:03:37Zoai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/59584Portal de revistashttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/Universidadhttp://www.ucr.ac.crhttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/index/oaijorge.polanco@ucr.ac.crCosta RicaNo aplicaNo aplicaNo aplicaopendoar:2025-08-13T10:03:17.049Portal de Revistas UCR - Universidad de Costa Ricafalse
score 15.811543

Similares en LA Referencia