Evaluación de la fricción en arcos ortodóncicos de acero inoxidable con y sin recubrimiento vítreo aplicado por el método sol-gel
ABSTRACT: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the static and dynamic frictional force generated between surfaces of metallic brackets and glass coated applied by the Sol-Gel method, and non coated wires. Methods: metallic brackets (0,018 x 0,025″), stainless steel wires (0,016 x 0,016″) an...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2009 |
| País: | Colombia |
| Institución: | Universidad de Antioquia |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio UdeA |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/4967 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10495/4967 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Fricción Brackets Alambres de acero Recubrimientos Sol-Gel |
| Sumario: | ABSTRACT: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the static and dynamic frictional force generated between surfaces of metallic brackets and glass coated applied by the Sol-Gel method, and non coated wires. Methods: metallic brackets (0,018 x 0,025″), stainless steel wires (0,016 x 0,016″) and elastic ligatures were used in all frictional tests. All components were characterized using SE M and optical microscopy. The frictional force was evaluated using a machine of tests Testresources® in dry environment. Results: the results showed that the stainless steel wires without modification (control group) showed the lowest values of static friction force followed by the stainless steel wires group coated by Sol-Gel method and the wires group with thermic treatment (thermic group). For dynamic friction force, the Sol-Gel group showed the smallest values, followed by the control group and the thermal group. Conclusion: the evaluated coating did not show a better frictional performance applied on stainless steel brackets in comparison with the control group. |
|---|