The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense

The article compares two different interpretations of Kant’s categorical imperative −the practical and the logical one− and defends the practical one, arguing that it is superior because it rejects cases of free riding without necessarily rejecting cases of coordination or timing. The logical interp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Dimitriu, Cristian
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2013
País:Colombia
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Repositorio:Repositorio UN
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/38472
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/38472
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28565/
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28565/2/
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Ethics
epistemology
Logic
Philosophy
B. Herman
C. Korsgaard
I. Kant
O. O’Neill
categorical imperative.
id CO_44d822ecf68bead60abb074c28362af5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/38472
network_acronym_str CO
network_name_str Colombia
repository_id_str
spelling The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defenseDimitriu, CristianEthicsepistemologyLogicPhilosophyB. HermanC. KorsgaardI. KantO. O’Neillcategorical imperative.The article compares two different interpretations of Kant’s categorical imperative −the practical and the logical one− and defends the practical one, arguing that it is superior because it rejects cases of free riding without necessarily rejecting cases of coordination or timing. The logical interpretation, on the other hand, leads to the undesirable outcome that it does not reject immoral cases of free riding, and to the desired outcome that it does not reject maxims of coordination/timing. Given that neither of them rejects maxims of coordination/timing (they are similar in that sense) and only the practical interpretation rejects free riding, the logical interpretation should be rejected.Universidad Nacional de Colombia2019-06-28T02:38:16Z2019-06-28T02:38:16Z2013Artículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/38472http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28565/http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28565/2/spahttp://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/26344Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN Ideas y ValoresIdeas y ValoresIdeas y Valores; Vol. 62, núm. 151 (2013); 105-113 Ideas y valores; Vol. 62, núm. 151 (2013); 105-113 2011-3668 0120-0062Dimitriu, Cristian (2013) The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense. Ideas y Valores; Vol. 62, núm. 151 (2013); 105-113 Ideas y valores; Vol. 62, núm. 151 (2013); 105-113 2011-3668 0120-0062 .Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de ColombiaAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositorio UNinstname:Universidad Nacional de Colombiainstacron:Universidad Nacional de Colombia2024-01-15T04:06:12Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense
title The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense
spellingShingle The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense
Dimitriu, Cristian
Ethics
epistemology
Logic
Philosophy
B. Herman
C. Korsgaard
I. Kant
O. O’Neill
categorical imperative.
title_short The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense
title_full The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense
title_fullStr The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense
title_full_unstemmed The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense
title_sort The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Dimitriu, Cristian
author Dimitriu, Cristian
author_facet Dimitriu, Cristian
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ethics
epistemology
Logic
Philosophy
B. Herman
C. Korsgaard
I. Kant
O. O’Neill
categorical imperative.
topic Ethics
epistemology
Logic
Philosophy
B. Herman
C. Korsgaard
I. Kant
O. O’Neill
categorical imperative.
description The article compares two different interpretations of Kant’s categorical imperative −the practical and the logical one− and defends the practical one, arguing that it is superior because it rejects cases of free riding without necessarily rejecting cases of coordination or timing. The logical interpretation, on the other hand, leads to the undesirable outcome that it does not reject immoral cases of free riding, and to the desired outcome that it does not reject maxims of coordination/timing. Given that neither of them rejects maxims of coordination/timing (they are similar in that sense) and only the practical interpretation rejects free riding, the logical interpretation should be rejected.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
2019-06-28T02:38:16Z
2019-06-28T02:38:16Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
Text
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/38472
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28565/
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28565/2/
url https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/38472
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28565/
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28565/2/
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/26344
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN Ideas y Valores
Ideas y Valores
Ideas y Valores; Vol. 62, núm. 151 (2013); 105-113 Ideas y valores; Vol. 62, núm. 151 (2013); 105-113 2011-3668 0120-0062
Dimitriu, Cristian (2013) The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense. Ideas y Valores; Vol. 62, núm. 151 (2013); 105-113 Ideas y valores; Vol. 62, núm. 151 (2013); 105-113 2011-3668 0120-0062 .
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio UN
instname:Universidad Nacional de Colombia
instacron:Universidad Nacional de Colombia
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Colombia
instacron_str Universidad Nacional de Colombia
institution Universidad Nacional de Colombia
reponame_str Repositorio UN
collection Repositorio UN
_version_ 1825052525211942912
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia