OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels

Introduction− Recent studies on the FFT processing (Fast Fourier Transform) or DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform) of the OFDM signal (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) have shown pros and cons for DVB-T2 (Digital Video Broadcasting-Second Generation Terrestrial) radio communications; however...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Paz Penagos, Hernan
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Data de publicação:2018
País:Colombia
Recursos:Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositório:Repositorio REDICUC
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/2388
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/11323/2388
https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Wireless channel
AWGN noise
Fading
Broadband communications
DWT and FFT
Canal inalámbrico
Ruido AWGN
Desvanecimientos
Comunicaciones de banda ancha
Procesado FFT y DWT
Desempeño
id CO_3f9a8bba767d492b3a1ace7a890bd665
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/2388
network_acronym_str CO
network_name_str Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels
Comparación OFDM con procesado FFT y DWT para canales inalámbricos DVB-T2.
title OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels
spellingShingle OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels
Paz Penagos, Hernan
Wireless channel
AWGN noise
Fading
Broadband communications
DWT and FFT
Canal inalámbrico
Ruido AWGN
Desvanecimientos
Comunicaciones de banda ancha
Procesado FFT y DWT
Desempeño
title_short OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels
title_full OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels
title_fullStr OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels
title_full_unstemmed OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels
title_sort OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Paz Penagos, Hernan
author Paz Penagos, Hernan
author_facet Paz Penagos, Hernan
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Wireless channel
AWGN noise
Fading
Broadband communications
DWT and FFT
Canal inalámbrico
Ruido AWGN
Desvanecimientos
Comunicaciones de banda ancha
Procesado FFT y DWT
Desempeño
topic Wireless channel
AWGN noise
Fading
Broadband communications
DWT and FFT
Canal inalámbrico
Ruido AWGN
Desvanecimientos
Comunicaciones de banda ancha
Procesado FFT y DWT
Desempeño
description Introduction− Recent studies on the FFT processing (Fast Fourier Transform) or DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform) of the OFDM signal (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) have shown pros and cons for DVB-T2 (Digital Video Broadcasting-Second Generation Terrestrial) radio communications; however, the benefits of both types of processing have yet to be compared for the same scenario. Objective− The objective of this research is to compare the response of the wireless channel with AWGN noise (Additive White Gaussian Noise Channel) and Rayleigh and Rician fading in the UHF (Ultra High Frequency) bandMethodology−The transmission of DVB-T2 information with OFDM modulation and FFT and DWT processing was simulated in Matlab®, specifically in Simulink. Results− The results of the study proved to be more ef-ficient for DWT system than FFT system, due to the low rate of erroneous bits, spectral efficiency and reduction of the Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR), for Eb / No relations greater than 10dB. Conclusions−In this article, we present the designs of both systems and the results of the research experience; likewise, the practical applicability of these systems is discussed, and improvements are suggested for future work.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-19
2019-02-11T22:32:28Z
2019-02-11T22:32:28Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Text
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv H. Paz Penagos, “OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels” INGE CUC, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 97-105, 2018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/2388
https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09
10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09
2382-4700
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
0122-6517
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv H. Paz Penagos, “OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels” INGE CUC, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 97-105, 2018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09
10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09
2382-4700
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
0122-6517
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
url https://hdl.handle.net/11323/2388
https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv INGE CUC; Vol. 14, Núm. 2 (2018)
INGE CUC
INGE CUC
M. Kolomytsey, A. Lipatov and A. Lyagoskin, “Statement of Problem for Synchronous Digital Television Network Planning”, CriMiCo, 2007, pp. 287-288.
K. Abdullah and Z. Hussain, “Studies on DWT-OFDM and FFT-OFDM Systems”, ICCCP, 2009.
K. Abdullah and Z. Hussain, “Impulsive Noise Effects on DWT- and WPTOFDM versus FFT-OFDM”, ICCCP, 2009.
G. Cherubini, E. Eleftheriou and S. Oelser, “Filtered Multitone Modulation for High-Speed DSL”, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 20, no. 5, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2002.1007382
H. Paz, Digital communications systems, Bogotá DC, Colombia: Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería, 2009.
L. Schulze, Theory and Applications of OFDM and CDMA–Wideband Wireless Communications, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2005, pp. 408. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470017406
ETSI Technical Specification, “Digital Video Broadcasting: System Specifications for Satellite Services to Handheld Devices (SH) below 3GHz”, ETSI TS 102-585, V.1.1.1, 2007.
ETSI European Standard, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): Second generation framing structure, cannel coding and modulation systems for Broadcasting, Interactive Services, News Gathering and other broadband satellite applications (DVB-S2)”, EN 302 307 V. 1.2.1, 2008.
M. García, S. Ruiz and F. Minerva, “Static delays optimization to reduce self-interference in DVB-T networks. Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)”, IEEE PIMRC, 2010, pp. 1-6.
R. Dilmirghani and M. Ghavami, “Wavelet Vs Fourier Based UWB Systems”, IEEE PIMRC, 2007, pp. 1-5.
D. Gupta, H. Torry, V. Vats and K. Garg, “Performance Analysis of DFT-OFDM, DCT-OFDM and DWT-OFDM Systems in AWGN Channel”, ICWMC, 2008.
S. Baig, U. Rehman and M. Mughal, “Performance comparison of DFT, discrete wavelet packet and wavelet transforms, in an OFDM transceiver for multipath fading channel”, in Proc. INMIC, 2005, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INMIC.2005.334509
W. Saad, N. El-Fishawy, S. El-Rabaie and M. Shokair, “An Efficient Technique for OFDM System Using Discrete Wavelet Transform”. In: Bellavista P., Chang RS., Chao HC., Lin SF., Sloot P.M.A. (eds) Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing. GPC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 6104, pp. 533-541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
P. Gonzáles, N. Pérez, J. Paredes, J. Uzcategui, J. Pena, L. da Silva, R. Lima and L. Silva, “Measurements of Terrestrial Digital TV Signals at Two Cities in South America”, EUCAP, 2010.
ACIEM, “¿Qué aspectos técnicos debe contener el DVBT2?”, ACIEM, Vol. 114, pp. 21-23, March 2012.
105
97
2
14
INGE CUC
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 9 páginas
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv INGE CUC
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/view/1588
reponame:Repositorio REDICUC
instname:Corporación Universidad de la Costa
instacron:Corporación Universidad de la Costa
instname_str Corporación Universidad de la Costa
instacron_str Corporación Universidad de la Costa
institution Corporación Universidad de la Costa
reponame_str Repositorio REDICUC
collection Repositorio REDICUC
_version_ 1825052851430227968
spelling OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channelsComparación OFDM con procesado FFT y DWT para canales inalámbricos DVB-T2.Paz Penagos, HernanWireless channelAWGN noiseFadingBroadband communicationsDWT and FFTCanal inalámbricoRuido AWGNDesvanecimientosComunicaciones de banda anchaProcesado FFT y DWTDesempeñoIntroduction− Recent studies on the FFT processing (Fast Fourier Transform) or DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform) of the OFDM signal (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) have shown pros and cons for DVB-T2 (Digital Video Broadcasting-Second Generation Terrestrial) radio communications; however, the benefits of both types of processing have yet to be compared for the same scenario. Objective− The objective of this research is to compare the response of the wireless channel with AWGN noise (Additive White Gaussian Noise Channel) and Rayleigh and Rician fading in the UHF (Ultra High Frequency) bandMethodology−The transmission of DVB-T2 information with OFDM modulation and FFT and DWT processing was simulated in Matlab®, specifically in Simulink. Results− The results of the study proved to be more ef-ficient for DWT system than FFT system, due to the low rate of erroneous bits, spectral efficiency and reduction of the Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR), for Eb / No relations greater than 10dB. Conclusions−In this article, we present the designs of both systems and the results of the research experience; likewise, the practical applicability of these systems is discussed, and improvements are suggested for future work.Introducción− Recientes estudios sobre el procesado FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) o DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform) de la señal OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Di-vision Multiplexing) han demostrado pros y contras para comunicaciones de radio DVB-T2 (Digital Video Broad-casting – Second Generation Terrestrial); sin embargo, aún falta comparar las prestaciones de ambos tipos de procesamiento para el mismo escenario. Objetivo− El objetivo de esta investigación es comparar la respuesta del canal inalámbrico con ruido AWGN (Ad-ditive White Gaussian Noise Channel) y desvanecimiento Rayleigh y Rician en la banda de UHF (Ultra High Fre-quency).Metodología− Se simuló en Matlab®, específicamente en Simulink, la transmisión de información DVB-T2 con modulación OFDM y procesado FFT y DWT. Resultados− Los resultados del estudio demostraron ser más eficientes para el sistema DWT en comparación con el Sistema FFT, por la baja tasa de bits errados, eficiencia espectral y reducción del cociente entre la potencia pico a promedio (PAPR: Peak-to-Average Power Ratio), para relaciones Eb/No mayores a 10dB. Conclusiones− En este artículo se presentan los diseños de ambos sistemas y los resultados de la experiencia de investigación; así mismo, se discute la aplicabilidad práctica de estos sistemas y se sugieren mejoras para trabajos futuros.Paz Penagos, Hernan-bfca625b-7769-4d9e-8c32-626d7605e094-0Corporación Universidad de la Costa2019-02-11T22:32:28Z2019-02-11T22:32:28Z2018-12-19Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa9 páginasapplication/pdfapplication/pdfH. Paz Penagos, “OFDM comparison with FFT and DWT processing for DVB-T2 wireless channels” INGE CUC, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 97-105, 2018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.09https://hdl.handle.net/11323/2388https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.0910.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.092382-4700Corporación Universidad de la Costa0122-6517REDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/INGE CUChttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/view/1588reponame:Repositorio REDICUCinstname:Corporación Universidad de la Costainstacron:Corporación Universidad de la CostaengINGE CUC; Vol. 14, Núm. 2 (2018)INGE CUCINGE CUCM. Kolomytsey, A. Lipatov and A. Lyagoskin, “Statement of Problem for Synchronous Digital Television Network Planning”, CriMiCo, 2007, pp. 287-288.K. Abdullah and Z. Hussain, “Studies on DWT-OFDM and FFT-OFDM Systems”, ICCCP, 2009.K. Abdullah and Z. Hussain, “Impulsive Noise Effects on DWT- and WPTOFDM versus FFT-OFDM”, ICCCP, 2009.G. Cherubini, E. Eleftheriou and S. Oelser, “Filtered Multitone Modulation for High-Speed DSL”, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 20, no. 5, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2002.1007382H. Paz, Digital communications systems, Bogotá DC, Colombia: Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería, 2009.L. Schulze, Theory and Applications of OFDM and CDMA–Wideband Wireless Communications, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2005, pp. 408. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470017406ETSI Technical Specification, “Digital Video Broadcasting: System Specifications for Satellite Services to Handheld Devices (SH) below 3GHz”, ETSI TS 102-585, V.1.1.1, 2007.ETSI European Standard, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): Second generation framing structure, cannel coding and modulation systems for Broadcasting, Interactive Services, News Gathering and other broadband satellite applications (DVB-S2)”, EN 302 307 V. 1.2.1, 2008.M. García, S. Ruiz and F. Minerva, “Static delays optimization to reduce self-interference in DVB-T networks. Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)”, IEEE PIMRC, 2010, pp. 1-6.R. Dilmirghani and M. Ghavami, “Wavelet Vs Fourier Based UWB Systems”, IEEE PIMRC, 2007, pp. 1-5.D. Gupta, H. Torry, V. Vats and K. Garg, “Performance Analysis of DFT-OFDM, DCT-OFDM and DWT-OFDM Systems in AWGN Channel”, ICWMC, 2008.S. Baig, U. Rehman and M. Mughal, “Performance comparison of DFT, discrete wavelet packet and wavelet transforms, in an OFDM transceiver for multipath fading channel”, in Proc. INMIC, 2005, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INMIC.2005.334509W. Saad, N. El-Fishawy, S. El-Rabaie and M. Shokair, “An Efficient Technique for OFDM System Using Discrete Wavelet Transform”. In: Bellavista P., Chang RS., Chao HC., Lin SF., Sloot P.M.A. (eds) Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing. GPC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 6104, pp. 533-541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.P. Gonzáles, N. Pérez, J. Paredes, J. Uzcategui, J. Pena, L. da Silva, R. Lima and L. Silva, “Measurements of Terrestrial Digital TV Signals at Two Cities in South America”, EUCAP, 2010.ACIEM, “¿Qué aspectos técnicos debe contener el DVBT2?”, ACIEM, Vol. 114, pp. 21-23, March 2012.10597214INGE CUCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf22024-09-17T15:47:27Z
score 15.81155