Have Public Interests Been Forgotten in NAFTA Chapter 11 Foreign Investor/Host State Arbitration - Some Conclusions from the Judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the Case of Mexico v. Metalclad

United Mexican States v. Metalclad Corp. (Mexico v. Metalclad) constitutes a landmark decision regarding both arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11 and review proceedings of NAFTA Chapter 11 arbitral awards. For the first time since their creation in 1978, the Additional Facility Rules of the Internati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Olasolo Alonso, Héctor
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2002
País:Colombia
Institución:Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/27795
Acceso en línea:https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/27795
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Arbitration awards
Descripción
Sumario:United Mexican States v. Metalclad Corp. (Mexico v. Metalclad) constitutes a landmark decision regarding both arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11 and review proceedings of NAFTA Chapter 11 arbitral awards. For the first time since their creation in 1978, the Additional Facility Rules of the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) have governed an international arbitration.' In addition, the case exhibits the first time an arbitration award under NAFTA Chapter 11 has been challenged in a national court as provided for in article 1136.3(b)(i).

Similares en LA Referencia