Estrategia pedagógica mediada por GeoGebra para el aprendizaje del pensamiento geométrico
The purpose of this research work is to generate a proposal that allows geometric strengthening through the use of GeoGebra mathematical software. The research was carried out under a quantitative approach, within the positivist-hypothetical deductive paradigm, maintaining coherence between the epis...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Colombia |
| Institución: | Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio REDICUC |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/8446 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8446 https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Pedagogical strategies Geometric thinking Metric GeoGebra Estrategias pedagógicas Pensamiento geométrico Métrico |
| Sumario: | The purpose of this research work is to generate a proposal that allows geometric strengthening through the use of GeoGebra mathematical software. The research was carried out under a quantitative approach, within the positivist-hypothetical deductive paradigm, maintaining coherence between the epistemology and the quasi-experimental design. The paradigm and approach of the research present a statistical procedure deepening the study, a diagnostic questionnaire to measure the competence of reasoning and argumentation of geometric thinking and a final questionnaire measuring the same competence, proposed GeoGebra script validated by the judgment of 2 experts indicating 100 % reliability, the specifications given in the instrument were valid for the achievement of the research objectives, then the validated instruments are applied to the census population, made up of 40 eighth grade students. Results evaluated before and after applying the proposal, initially establishing in the diagnosis, 82% of students do not know the subject and only 20% of students were able to develop the correctly evaluated points; After applying the proposal, evaluating the knowledge acquired by 40% of the students, they did not answer correctly the five points of the evaluation and 60% of the students were able to develop the evaluated points correctly. Finally showing that the impact of the proposal was positive in a significant way; because the knowledge of the eighth group was expanded in 10 students equivalent to 25% of the group. |
|---|