Adaptation and Measurement Invariance by Gender of the Flourishing Scale in a Colombian Sample
There is increasing interest in the study of flourishing as an indicator of subjective wellbeing. The objective herein was to adapt and study the psychometric properties of Diener’s Flourishing Scale (FS) among the Colombian population. Accordingly, a cross-sectional study was conducted with a non-p...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Colombia |
| Recursos: | Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio UCC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/34905 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052664 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/34905 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Escala Fluorishing Escala Prosperidad Bienestar Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales Propiedades psicométricas Invariancia de medición Análisis factorial confirmatorio Población colombiana Salud Calidad de vida Evaluación psicológica Flourishing scal Wellbeing Structural equation modeling Psychometric properties Measurement invariance Confirmatory factor analysis Colombian population Health Quality of life Psychological assessment |
| Resumo: | There is increasing interest in the study of flourishing as an indicator of subjective wellbeing. The objective herein was to adapt and study the psychometric properties of Diener’s Flourishing Scale (FS) among the Colombian population. Accordingly, a cross-sectional study was conducted with a non-probability sample of 1255 Colombian adults. The scale’s structure, invariance by gender, and convergent and concurrent validity were studied from a confirmatory perspective using structural equation models. The confirmatory factor analysis showed excellent fit indicators for the one-dimensional structure (CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.039, SRMR = 0.020) as well as for the convergent (CFI = 0.909, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.063) and concurrent (CFI = 0.966, RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.041) validity models. The correlations calculated among flourishing with positive and negative effects (PANAS), satisfaction with life (SWL), and optimism and pessimism (LOT) were statistically significant and as expected. Configural, metric, and scalar invariance across gender was confirmed. Percentiles were provided for the total score. The FS scale was a valid and reliable measure to assess high levels of wellbeing among the Colombian population |
|---|