Comment of Encinas et al. (2014) on: ´Evidence for an Early-Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): Paleontological, climatic and tectonic implications´ of Gutiérrez et al. (2013, Andean Geology 40 (1): 66-78
The age of the Navidad Formation in central Chile has always been controversial, mainly due to the conflicting age ranges indicated by its macro- and microfossils. Macrofossils are generally interpreted as having been reworked from older, Early to Middle
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | Chile |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.anid.cl:10533/238096 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10533/238096 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Sumario: | The age of the Navidad Formation in central Chile has always been controversial, mainly due to the conflicting age ranges indicated by its macro- and microfossils. Macrofossils are generally interpreted as having been reworked from older, Early to Middle |
|---|