The paradox in Language Argumentation Theory: a linguistic-argumentative issue - DOI: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v31i2.6543
In the Language Argumentation Theory (TAL), the concept of paradox is linked to the hypothesis that it can be defined in merely linguistic terms. In this definition, it is understood that there is a structural argumentation related to some expressions in natural languages. This concept indicates tha...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2009 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
| Repositorio: | Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/6543 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/6543 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | paradox language argumentation paradoxical enchainments discourse theories paradoxo argumentação na língua encadeamentos paradoxais teorias do discurso |
| Sumario: | In the Language Argumentation Theory (TAL), the concept of paradox is linked to the hypothesis that it can be defined in merely linguistic terms. In this definition, it is understood that there is a structural argumentation related to some expressions in natural languages. This concept indicates that language is associated to some words and their internal argumentations. Through the analysis of paradoxical enchainments, defined by Oswald Ducrot and Marion Carel (2001), in the Language Argumentation Theory, this article aims to confirm that some kinds of paradox can be explained in strictly linguistic terms, without being considered something contradictory, absurd or even difficult to understand. |
|---|