Ergonomic working posture in simulated dental clinical conditions: Effect of magnification on the operator’s experience

Objectives. This study observed the effect of different magnification systems on working posture and neck angulation during cavity preparation procedures according to operator’s experience. Methods. This was a laboratory study. The response variables were the neck angulation and the working posture...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Wajngarten, Danielle [UNESP], Pazos, Júlia Margato [UNESP], Sasso Garcia, Patricia Petromilli Nordi [UNESP]
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2021
Country:Brasil
Institution:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Repository:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206220
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11168
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206220
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Dental education
Magnification
Professional practice
Description
Summary:Objectives. This study observed the effect of different magnification systems on working posture and neck angulation during cavity preparation procedures according to operator’s experience. Methods. This was a laboratory study. The response variables were the neck angulation and the working posture adopted during Class I cavity preparations (N = 640) that were performed under four conditions (unaided visualization, simple loupe, Galilean loupe and Keplerian loupe). Working postures were recorded and evaluated by the Compliance Assessment of Dental Ergonomic Posture Requirements (CADEP). The two-factor ANOVA and Games-Howell post-hoc test were performed (α = 0.05). Results. For all treated teeth it was observed higher posture scores and lowest neck angulations while using the Galilean and Keplerian loupes (p < 0.01). No correlations were found between operator’s experience and working posture (p = 0.71–0.88). Conclusion. It can be concluded that Galilean and Keplerian loupes helped operators to maintain an ergonomic posture and lower neck angulations for all teeth and the operator’s experience provided better ergonomic posture for the mandibular teeth.