Interaction of alterity and argumentation in the theoretical discussion section of the thesis
This study is based on the dialogic theory/analysis of discourse (BAKHTIN, [1979] 2003, [1920-1924] 2017, [1979] 2010, [1929] 2013, [1934] 2015, [1978] 2016; VOLO-CHÍNOV, [1930] 2013, [1929] 2017), in dialogue with the theory of argumentation in discourse (AMOSSY, 2011, [2016] 2020). We aim to inves...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2021 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Associação Brasileira de Linguística (ABRALIN) |
| Repositório: | Cadernos de Linguística |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs3.cadernos.abralin.org:article/559 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/559 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Vozes. Dialogismo. Argumentação. Discurso acadêmico-científico. Voices Dialogism Argumentation Academic-scientific discourse |
| Resumo: | This study is based on the dialogic theory/analysis of discourse (BAKHTIN, [1979] 2003, [1920-1924] 2017, [1979] 2010, [1929] 2013, [1934] 2015, [1978] 2016; VOLO-CHÍNOV, [1930] 2013, [1929] 2017), in dialogue with the theory of argumentation in discourse (AMOSSY, 2011, [2016] 2020). We aim to investigate the alterity in the argumentative construction in the theoretical section of a dissertation. The otherness relations, the self and the other, are basic axiological categories in Bakhtin's thought, understood as two poles of values in a continuous dialogical relationship. In the genres of academic-scientific discourse, various voices intersect and points of view are confronted in relation to the object to be analyzed and interpreted. These discursive genres are not neutral, they always have a theoretical position, they embody the ideologies or worldviews of their fields of activity and the responsive acts and the researchers' positions or points of view are full of valuations. The question is: how do voices interact dialogically for the argumentative construction? The methodological design is qualitative, interpretive, through empirical research of the corpus collected in the Capes dissertations and theses bank in the public domain (online). Research analysis is ongoing. The analysis categories will be: voices; argumentative modalities, reaction to the other's word (resumption, modification or refutation); preexisting discursive constellation. We hope to contribute to the studies of discourse and academic writing. |
|---|