High resting energy expenditure in women with episodic migraine: exploring the use of predictive formulas

Introduction: Migraine is a common and disabling primary headache, and its pathophysiology is not fully understood. Previous studies have suggested that pain can increase humans’ Resting Energy Expenditure (REE). However, no previous study has investigated whether the REE of individuals with migrain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Laís Bhering Martins, Jéssica Ribeiro, Ana Maria Rodrigues, Luana Caroline Dos Santos, Antonio Lucio Teixeira Junior, Adaliene Versiani Matos Ferreira
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/78782
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/1843/78782
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-8649
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1144-9179
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7207-3143
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9836-3704
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-5422
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-8652
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Resting energy expenditure
Migraine
Predictive formulas
Pain
Nutrition
Nutrição
Saúde da mulher
Cefaléia
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: Migraine is a common and disabling primary headache, and its pathophysiology is not fully understood. Previous studies have suggested that pain can increase humans’ Resting Energy Expenditure (REE). However, no previous study has investigated whether the REE of individuals with migraine differs from the general population. Therefore, this study aims to assess whether the REE of women with migraine differs from that of women without headaches. We also tested the accuracy of REE predictive formulas in the migraine patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study involves 131 adult women aged between 18 and 65 years, 83 with migraine and 48 without (controls). We collected clinical, demographic, and anthropometric data. Migraine severity was measured using the Migraine Disability Test and Headache Impact Test, version 6. The REE was measured by indirect calorimetry, and it was compared with the predicted REE calculated by formulas. Results: Patients with migraine had higher REE when compared to controls (p  <  0.01). There was a positive correlation between REE and the patient-reported number of migraine attacks per month (Rho  =  0.226; p =  0.044). Mifflin-St Jeor and Henry and Rees were the predictive formulas that have more accuracy in predicting REE in women with migraine. Discussion: Considering the benefits of nutritional interventions on treating migraines, accurately measuring REE can positively impact migraine patient care. This study enhances our understanding of the relationship between pain and energy expenditure. Our results also provide valuable insights for healthcare professionals in selecting the most effective predictive formula to calculate energy expenditure in patients with migraine.