O que é preciso para ser um externista em epistemologia?
In this paper, we will explore two related questions: (i) What are the fundamental aspects of the internalism vs. externalism dispute in contemporary epistemology?; (ii) Is externalism compatible with a no-defeater clause? Both issues spark controversy. We will argue that there is a suitable answer...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
| Repositorio: | Perspectiva Filosófica (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:oai.periodicos.ufpe.br:article/247943 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/perspectivafilosofica/article/view/247943 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | internalism externalism justification defeaters internismo externismo justificação derrotadores |
| Sumario: | In this paper, we will explore two related questions: (i) What are the fundamental aspects of the internalism vs. externalism dispute in contemporary epistemology?; (ii) Is externalism compatible with a no-defeater clause? Both issues spark controversy. We will argue that there is a suitable answer to our first question: the internalism vs. externalism dispute is at its core one about which role the mind-world relations play in the acquisition of epistemic justification. Based on that claim, we will hold that there is also a suitable answer to our second question: an externalist may well adhere to a nodefeater clause. Such results will allow us to show that some significant claims regarding the internalism vs. externalism dispute that people have made recently in the literature are incorrect. |
|---|