Justiça e desonestidade acadêmica: um estudo com estudantes do curso de ciências contábeis

The main purpose of this study was to analyze the relation between the perception of justice in the academic environment and aspects related to the academic dishonesty of Accounting undergraduate students. The study sample consisted of 451 respondents by the survey method. The research findings show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Débora Santos, Bruna Camargos Avelino, Jacqueline Veneroso Alves da Cunha, Romualdo Douglas Colauto
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/53849
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2020v17n44p71
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/53849
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9491-1507
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8958-8725
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2522-3035
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3589-9389
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Desonestidade Acadêmica
Justiça Acadêmica
Ciências Contábeis
Descripción
Sumario:The main purpose of this study was to analyze the relation between the perception of justice in the academic environment and aspects related to the academic dishonesty of Accounting undergraduate students. The study sample consisted of 451 respondents by the survey method. The research findings show that the three dimensions of academic justice presented statistically significance, influencing academic dishonesty. When students perceive distributive, procedural, and interactional injustice, they tend, in average, to practice dishonest attitudes. The results suggest that the practice of academic dishonesty may be a way that students use to compensate the injustice perceived in the educational environment. Therefore, in the presence of injustice, dishonesty tends to be manifested. In other words, dishonesty can be the "student's justice" to alleviate distributional, procedural, and interactional injustice.