May 68's effects in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology questioned
After the eruption of May 68, the dichotomy between scientific knowledge and ideology, as Althusserians supported, is jeopardized in favor of Jacques Rancière’s valuing of the 1960s boiling political movements. In this essay, we analyze this moment of his path, in which the author rephrases his unde...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
| Repositorio: | Pro-Posições (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8676021 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8676021 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Rancière Althusser Ciência Ideologia Política Ideology Politics |
| Sumario: | After the eruption of May 68, the dichotomy between scientific knowledge and ideology, as Althusserians supported, is jeopardized in favor of Jacques Rancière’s valuing of the 1960s boiling political movements. In this essay, we analyze this moment of his path, in which the author rephrases his understanding of the meaning of political revolt and the conception of knowledge. This debate is not circumstantial in Rancière’s work. It first appears as a question crossing his thought and is still present in his current writings: the refusal to divide knowledge and its intellectual hierarchies and the suspicion towards a conception that politics would require theory as a prerequisite. |
|---|