Boosting and predictability of macroeconomic variables : evidence from Brazil
This paper aims to elaborate a treated data set and apply the boosting methodology to monthly Brazilian macroeconomic variables to check its predictability. The forecasting performed here consists in using linear and nonlinear base-learners, as well as a third type of model that has both linear and...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/281582 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/281582 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Previsões econômicas Séries temporais Econometria Boosting Econometrics Forecasting Macroeconomic time series Nonlinear |
| Sumario: | This paper aims to elaborate a treated data set and apply the boosting methodology to monthly Brazilian macroeconomic variables to check its predictability. The forecasting performed here consists in using linear and nonlinear base-learners, as well as a third type of model that has both linear and nonlinear components in the estimation of the variables using the history itself with lag up to 12 periods. We want to investigate which models and for which forecast horizons we have the strongest performance. The results obtained here through diferent evaluation approaches point out that, on average, the performance of boosting models using P-Splines as base-learner are the ones that have the best results, especially the methodology with two components: two-stage boosting. In addition, we conducted an analysis on a subgroup of variables with data available until 2022 to verify the validity of our conclusions. We also compared the performance of boosted trees with other models and evaluated model parameters using both cross-validation and Akaike Information Criteria in order to check the robustness of the results. |
|---|