Comparação analítica entre resultados da glicemia em bovinos obtidos com glicosímetro portátil vs método enzimático.
Changes in glycemic levels can negatively affect the body. Several techniques for the measurement of blood glucose have been described, but the enzymatic method is considered standard and more accurate in both humans and animals. The College of American Pathologists recommends the use of portable gl...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1133457 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1133457 https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.102954 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Glicemia Glicosímetro Método enzimático Glycemia Livestock animals Glucometer Enzymatic method Metabolismo Bovino Metabolism |
| Resumo: | Changes in glycemic levels can negatively affect the body. Several techniques for the measurement of blood glucose have been described, but the enzymatic method is considered standard and more accurate in both humans and animals. The College of American Pathologists recommends the use of portable glucometers (PGs), which are routinely used in human medicine because this is an easy, relatively inexpensive method that delivers results quickly. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the measurement of blood glucose in cattle obtained using portable Accu-Check® glucometer with the enzymatic method (EM), which is still considered standard. |
|---|