Comparação analítica entre resultados da glicemia em bovinos obtidos com glicosímetro portátil vs método enzimático.

Changes in glycemic levels can negatively affect the body. Several techniques for the measurement of blood glucose have been described, but the enzymatic method is considered standard and more accurate in both humans and animals. The College of American Pathologists recommends the use of portable gl...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: HELAYEL, M. A., CUNHA, N. C. da, MORON, S. E., SILVA, P. C. A. R. da, UNHA, I. M. da, CHENARD, M. G., CARVALHO, V. de A. N., SOUZA, G. N. de, LOPES, S. de P.
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:Brasil
Recursos:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1133457
Acesso em linha:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1133457
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.102954
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Glicemia
Glicosímetro
Método enzimático
Glycemia
Livestock animals
Glucometer
Enzymatic method
Metabolismo
Bovino
Metabolism
Descrição
Resumo:Changes in glycemic levels can negatively affect the body. Several techniques for the measurement of blood glucose have been described, but the enzymatic method is considered standard and more accurate in both humans and animals. The College of American Pathologists recommends the use of portable glucometers (PGs), which are routinely used in human medicine because this is an easy, relatively inexpensive method that delivers results quickly. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the measurement of blood glucose in cattle obtained using portable Accu-Check® glucometer with the enzymatic method (EM), which is still considered standard.