Cálculo da mínima diferença clínica importante dos escores lysholm e ikdc após reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior

Objective: To calculate the minimal important clinical difference (MICD) value for the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores in a sample of patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Methods: Primary, observational, retrospective, analytical study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Bruno Fajardo Donascimento, Mariana Bandeira da Rocha Lima, Jair Moreira Dias Júnior, Jurandir Antunes Filho, Túlio Vinícius de Oliveira Campos, Adriano Fernando Mendes Júnior
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2023
Country:Brasil
Institution:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Repository:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Language:Portuguese
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/60656
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60656
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Ligamento Cruzado Anterior
Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior
Articulação do joelho
Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
Inquéritos e Questionários
Articulação do Joelho
Description
Summary:Objective: To calculate the minimal important clinical difference (MICD) value for the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores in a sample of patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Methods: Primary, observational, retrospective, analytical study of participants submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from March 2019 to December 2020 by the same surgeon, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, analysis of kneefunction in the pre- and postoperative period by the Lysholm and IKDC scores, and answer to an anchor question at 6 months postoperatively for the calculation of the MICD of each score.Results A total of 59 patients participated in the study, with a mean age of 27.1 5.7 years old. In the comparison between pre- and postoperative scores of all groups, there was an increase in values with statistical significance after intervention. The MICD was 5.5 for the Lysholm score, and the MICD value for the IKDC score could not be determined.Conclusion: For the Lysholm score, the calculation of the MICD value by the anchor question method in the sample evaluated was 5.5. It was not possible to determine the value of the MICD for the IKDC score.