Juntos Permanecemos, Divididos Caímos: Desafios E Perspectivas Para A Liderança Regional Do Uzbequistão Na Ásia Central | Juntos Permanecemos, Divididos Caemos: Desafíos Y Perspectivas Para El Liderazgo Regional De Uzbekistán En Asia Central : DESAFIOS E PERSPECTIVAS PARA O REGIONALISMO NA ÁSIA CENTRAL
This paper discusses the advantages and importance of regional integration groupings in Central Asia. The study aims to address how unsuccessful attempts at association in the region may indicate the end of Central Asian regionalism, given the recent role that Uzbekistan has played as a promoter of...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Neiba |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/82070 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/neiba/article/view/82070 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Regionalism Central Asia Uzbekistan Regionalismo, Asia Central, Uzbekistán Regionalismo Asia Central Uzbekistán Ásia Central Uzbequistão |
| Sumario: | This paper discusses the advantages and importance of regional integration groupings in Central Asia. The study aims to address how unsuccessful attempts at association in the region may indicate the end of Central Asian regionalism, given the recent role that Uzbekistan has played as a promoter of dialogue and cooperation. To do so, the research was primarily based on a bibliographic review of primary and secondary sources to support the proposed discussion. In particular, the paper analyzes the context of such initiatives within the framework of the Central Asian Economic Community (CAEC) and the reasons that led to their extinction, drawing parallels between what drives Central Asian countries toward integration and what hinders its progress. It also examines the potential of the Uzbek government as an alternative for resolving regional disputes, as well as the limitations and scope of its role as a promoter of local regionalism. |
|---|