Direct, indirect and simultaneous selection as strategies for alfalfa breeding on forage yield and nutritive value

Alfalfa breeding aimed at trait improvement for livestock feed takes longer periods of time, if compared to many other crops. Therefore, better selection methods are necessary for the success of alfalfa breeding programs. Although knowing about selection methods is quite important, there is a notabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gonçalves dos Santos, Iara, Damião Cruz, Cosme, Nascimento, Moysés, Domiciano Silva Rosado, Renato, de Paula Ferreira, Reinaldo
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
Repositorio:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/51950
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/51950
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Medicago sativa
selection gains
selection index.
Ganhos de seleção
Índice de seleção
Descripción
Sumario:Alfalfa breeding aimed at trait improvement for livestock feed takes longer periods of time, if compared to many other crops. Therefore, better selection methods are necessary for the success of alfalfa breeding programs. Although knowing about selection methods is quite important, there is a notable lack of information, as regards successful solutions. This study aimed to use direct, indirect and simultaneous selection methods for selecting alfalfa cultivars, based on yield traits and nutritive value. The evaluated traits were subdivided into two groups: forage yield and nutritive value. Selection gains were estimated by direct, indirect and simultaneous selection for each group, considering the selection of the 25 % best cultivars. Direct and indirect selections among genotype averages are not efficient to provide the desirable responses to the whole set of traits. The results for simultaneous selection, using the Tai index, provided a more balanced gain distribution to the set of traits in all cuts. The simultaneous selection allowed the identification of the 5681 and Verdor cultivars in the first cut, as well as ProINTA Patricia in the second cut, as superior in the two groups of evaluated traits.