GROWTH AND YIELD IN MONOSPECIFIC AND MIXED STANDS OF Eucalyptus urograndis AND Acacia mearnsii

Forest intercropping with nitrogen-fixing species can provide an increase in eucalyptus yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate growth and yield in monospecific and mixed stands of Eucalyptus urograndis and Acacia mearnsii, in Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Treatments were 100E (1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Viera, Márcio, Schumacher, Mauro Valdir, Liberalesso, Edenilson
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2011
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
Repositorio:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/10760
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/10760
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake x Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden
Acacia mearnsii De Wild
forest intercropping
species interaction.
consórcio florestal
interações entre espécies.
Descripción
Sumario:Forest intercropping with nitrogen-fixing species can provide an increase in eucalyptus yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate growth and yield in monospecific and mixed stands of Eucalyptus urograndis and Acacia mearnsii, in Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Treatments were 100E (100% eucalyptus), 100A (100% black wattle), 50E:50A (50% eucalyptus + 50% black wattle), 75E:25A (75% eucalyptus + 25% black wattle), and 25E:75A (25% eucalyptus + 75% black wattle). The first evaluation was carried out at the age of 6 months (diameter at stem and total height) and the second at 18 months (diameter at breast height, total height, volume with bark, and leaf area index). The Eucalyptus urograndis and Acacia mearnsii diameter and total height growth, for both 6 and 18 months, did not differ among treatments. The total wood yield (m3 ha-1) was the same for cropping and intercropping, without any influence from other species. The mixed cropping system resulted in a greater number of individuals with higher diameters (? + 1?), when compared to the cropping system, offering the forester an opportunity to obtain multiple products from his/her forest, due to a greater assortment provided by the presence of the two species.