Criminal Writ of Mandamus:: situations in which it can be sued
The broad statutory provision of criminal appeals in the Brazilian legal system, in addition to the constitutional provision of the writ of mandamus, made us to inquire about the use of the writ in our criminal field, both ideologically and dogmatically. Our hypothesis, which limited the writ of man...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública (FBSP) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revista.forumseguranca.org.br:article/1126 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revista.forumseguranca.org.br/rbsp/article/view/1126 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Fundamentos Filosóficos dos Recursos. Hipóteses de Mandado de Segurança Criminal. Philosofical Fundament of Appeals. Criminal Writ of Mandamus Cases. |
| Sumario: | The broad statutory provision of criminal appeals in the Brazilian legal system, in addition to the constitutional provision of the writ of mandamus, made us to inquire about the use of the writ in our criminal field, both ideologically and dogmatically. Our hypothesis, which limited the writ of mandamus to challenge absurd, or manifestly illegal, judicial decisions, although ideologically confirmed, based on the philosophy of appeals in general, was not dogmatically affirmed. Nevertheless, it did not constrict us from conclude that most of the casuistic situations pointed out by our national doctrine are excessive. |
|---|