Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system

Background and aims: Understanding the fate of nitrogen (N) in maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with tropical grass is essential to develop sustainable fertilization recommendations and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. To test the hypothesis that intercropping forage grass with maize improves yiel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gazola, Bruno [UNESP], Mariano, Eduardo [UNESP], Andrade, Maria G. O. [UNESP], Costa, Vladimir E. [UNESP], Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/309616
Acceso en línea:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06139-8
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/309616
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:15N
Forage grasses
Integrated cropping system
Nitrogen use efficiency
id BR_eb79421fa8e8f951a89fac11a71ea06f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/309616
network_acronym_str BR
network_name_str Brasil
repository_id_str
spelling Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system15NForage grassesIntegrated cropping systemNitrogen use efficiencyBackground and aims: Understanding the fate of nitrogen (N) in maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with tropical grass is essential to develop sustainable fertilization recommendations and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. To test the hypothesis that intercropping forage grass with maize improves yield and fertilizer N recovery in the system, this study evaluated the recovery of N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass grown as a double crop after soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Methods: A two–year field experiment was conducted. In each season maize was intercropped with either Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus; syn. Panicum maximum) or ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis; syn. Brachiaria ruziziensis) in southeastern Brazil in the presence or absence of N fertilization, followed by a soybean crop. 15N–enriched ammonium sulfate was used to trace the fate of the applied N. Results: Total recovery of fertilizer N by maize differed with season (≈ 35 and 22%) and was greater in the grain than vegetative fractions. Uptake of fertilizer N by intercropped forage grass was less than maize but substantial (≈ 11–18%) After maize harvest more than 60% of the N applied remained in the system, partly in forage grass and maize residues but mostly in soil. Up to 12% of the N applied was recovered by soybean grown in succession. Conclusion: The introduction of either Guinea grass or ruzigrass intercropped with maize can decrease N losses from fertilizer and increase recovery by soybean grown after maize, particularly when maize yield and N uptake are low.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)College of Agricultural Sciences Department of Crop Science São Paulo State University, SPCenter for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture University of São PauloBiosciences Institute São Paulo State UniversityCollege of Agricultural Sciences Department of Crop Science São Paulo State University, SPBiosciences Institute São Paulo State UniversityFAPESP: 2018/15867-3FAPESP: 2019/15563-7Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)2025-04-29T20:16:04Z2024-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article205-219http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06139-8Plant and Soil, v. 496, n. 1-2, p. 205-219, 2024.1573-50360032-079Xhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/30961610.1007/s11104-023-06139-82-s2.0-85163308981Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPlant and Soilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGazola, Bruno [UNESP]Mariano, Eduardo [UNESP]Andrade, Maria G. O. [UNESP]Costa, Vladimir E. [UNESP]Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]2025-04-30T13:33:32Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/309616Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T13:33:32Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system
title Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system
spellingShingle Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system
Gazola, Bruno [UNESP]
15N
Forage grasses
Integrated cropping system
Nitrogen use efficiency
title_short Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system
title_full Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system
title_fullStr Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system
title_full_unstemmed Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system
title_sort Fate of fertilizer N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass and recovery of residual N by soybean in a double cropping system
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gazola, Bruno [UNESP]
Mariano, Eduardo [UNESP]
Andrade, Maria G. O. [UNESP]
Costa, Vladimir E. [UNESP]
Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]
author Gazola, Bruno [UNESP]
author_facet Gazola, Bruno [UNESP]
Mariano, Eduardo [UNESP]
Andrade, Maria G. O. [UNESP]
Costa, Vladimir E. [UNESP]
Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Mariano, Eduardo [UNESP]
Andrade, Maria G. O. [UNESP]
Costa, Vladimir E. [UNESP]
Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv 15N
Forage grasses
Integrated cropping system
Nitrogen use efficiency
topic 15N
Forage grasses
Integrated cropping system
Nitrogen use efficiency
description Background and aims: Understanding the fate of nitrogen (N) in maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with tropical grass is essential to develop sustainable fertilization recommendations and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. To test the hypothesis that intercropping forage grass with maize improves yield and fertilizer N recovery in the system, this study evaluated the recovery of N applied to maize intercropped with forage grass grown as a double crop after soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Methods: A two–year field experiment was conducted. In each season maize was intercropped with either Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus; syn. Panicum maximum) or ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis; syn. Brachiaria ruziziensis) in southeastern Brazil in the presence or absence of N fertilization, followed by a soybean crop. 15N–enriched ammonium sulfate was used to trace the fate of the applied N. Results: Total recovery of fertilizer N by maize differed with season (≈ 35 and 22%) and was greater in the grain than vegetative fractions. Uptake of fertilizer N by intercropped forage grass was less than maize but substantial (≈ 11–18%) After maize harvest more than 60% of the N applied remained in the system, partly in forage grass and maize residues but mostly in soil. Up to 12% of the N applied was recovered by soybean grown in succession. Conclusion: The introduction of either Guinea grass or ruzigrass intercropped with maize can decrease N losses from fertilizer and increase recovery by soybean grown after maize, particularly when maize yield and N uptake are low.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-01
2025-04-29T20:16:04Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06139-8
Plant and Soil, v. 496, n. 1-2, p. 205-219, 2024.
1573-5036
0032-079X
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/309616
10.1007/s11104-023-06139-8
2-s2.0-85163308981
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06139-8
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/309616
identifier_str_mv Plant and Soil, v. 496, n. 1-2, p. 205-219, 2024.
1573-5036
0032-079X
10.1007/s11104-023-06139-8
2-s2.0-85163308981
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Plant and Soil
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 205-219
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1853671501186727936
score 15,301603