BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food

ABSTRACT: In 1991, with the ratification of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Brazil recognized food as a right. This recognition was corroborated by the publication of Federal Law 11346/2006 and the promulgation of Constitutional Amendment 64/2010, which included t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Evaristo Guerra, João Marcel
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2024
Country:Brasil
Institution:Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP)
Repository:Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da Unesp (Online)
Language:Portuguese
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.franca.unesp.br:article/4494
Online Access:https://periodicos.franca.unesp.br/index.php/estudosjuridicosunesp/article/view/4494
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Alimentação
Direito
Jurisprudência
Food
Right
Jurisprudence
id BR_e6ebd9ecea6ef5c6347dbc42e352e7f3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.franca.unesp.br:article/4494
network_acronym_str BR
network_name_str Brasil
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
ENTRE A FOME E O SILÊNCIO: Uma análise da jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça atinente ao Direito Humano à Alimentação Adequada
title BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
spellingShingle BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
Evaristo Guerra, João Marcel
Alimentação
Direito
Jurisprudência
Food
Right
Jurisprudence
title_short BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
title_full BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
title_fullStr BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
title_full_unstemmed BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
title_sort BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Evaristo Guerra, João Marcel
author Evaristo Guerra, João Marcel
author_facet Evaristo Guerra, João Marcel
author_role author
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alimentação
Direito
Jurisprudência
Food
Right
Jurisprudence
topic Alimentação
Direito
Jurisprudência
Food
Right
Jurisprudence
description ABSTRACT: In 1991, with the ratification of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Brazil recognized food as a right. This recognition was corroborated by the publication of Federal Law 11346/2006 and the promulgation of Constitutional Amendment 64/2010, which included the Human Right to Adequate Food (HRAF) in the list of explicit Social Rights of the Federal Constitution. Despite the standardization of the HRAF, in practice, in 2022, Brazil had 125.2 million people in food insecurity, included in this group, the more than 33 million people in a situation of hunger, the most serious type of food insecurity. With the normative scope of the aforementioned texts and the hunger crisis observed in the country, the hypothesis was raised that there would be a large number of demands involving the HRAF within the scope of the Superior Court of Justice – the jurisdictional body responsible for the interpretative standardization of the federal legislation. It was also suggested that the HRAF interpretative approach in the Superior Court of Justice jurisprudence was primarily guided by the fight against hunger. Based on a descriptive methodology, based on data collected directly from the jurisprudence of that court, analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively, the research aimed to know how many and what demands about HRAF reached that Court and how it manifested itself. It was concluded that only 04 (four) rulings explicitly dealing with HRAF were handed down by Superior Court of Justice throughout its existence, with none focusing on combating hunger, limiting HRAF to Sanitary Adequacy, that is, the search for food free from substances harmful to health.   Keywords: Food; Right; Jurisprudence.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.franca.unesp.br/index.php/estudosjuridicosunesp/article/view/4494
10.22171/rejunesp.v28i48.4494
url https://periodicos.franca.unesp.br/index.php/estudosjuridicosunesp/article/view/4494
identifier_str_mv 10.22171/rejunesp.v28i48.4494
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.franca.unesp.br/index.php/estudosjuridicosunesp/article/view/4494/3598
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da UNESP
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da UNESP
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da UNESP; v. 28 n. 48 (2024): Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP; 135-156
UNESP Journal of Legal Studies; Vol. 28 No. 48 (2024): Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP; 135-156
Revista de Estudios Jurídicos de UNESP; Vol. 28 Núm. 48 (2024): Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP; 135-156
Revue d'Études Juridiques d'UNESP; Vol. 28 No. 48 (2024): Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP; 135-156
2179-5177
1414-3097
10.22171/rejunesp.v28i48
reponame:Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da Unesp (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da Unesp (Online)
collection Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da Unesp (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da Unesp (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rej.unesp@gmail.com
_version_ 1853662409914318848
spelling BETWEEN HUNGER AND SILENCE : An analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the Human Right to Adequate FoodENTRE A FOME E O SILÊNCIO: Uma análise da jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça atinente ao Direito Humano à Alimentação AdequadaAlimentaçãoDireitoJurisprudênciaFoodRightJurisprudenceABSTRACT: In 1991, with the ratification of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Brazil recognized food as a right. This recognition was corroborated by the publication of Federal Law 11346/2006 and the promulgation of Constitutional Amendment 64/2010, which included the Human Right to Adequate Food (HRAF) in the list of explicit Social Rights of the Federal Constitution. Despite the standardization of the HRAF, in practice, in 2022, Brazil had 125.2 million people in food insecurity, included in this group, the more than 33 million people in a situation of hunger, the most serious type of food insecurity. With the normative scope of the aforementioned texts and the hunger crisis observed in the country, the hypothesis was raised that there would be a large number of demands involving the HRAF within the scope of the Superior Court of Justice – the jurisdictional body responsible for the interpretative standardization of the federal legislation. It was also suggested that the HRAF interpretative approach in the Superior Court of Justice jurisprudence was primarily guided by the fight against hunger. Based on a descriptive methodology, based on data collected directly from the jurisprudence of that court, analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively, the research aimed to know how many and what demands about HRAF reached that Court and how it manifested itself. It was concluded that only 04 (four) rulings explicitly dealing with HRAF were handed down by Superior Court of Justice throughout its existence, with none focusing on combating hunger, limiting HRAF to Sanitary Adequacy, that is, the search for food free from substances harmful to health.   Keywords: Food; Right; Jurisprudence.Em 1991, com a ratificação do Pacto Internacional dos Direitos Econômicos, Sociais e Culturais, o Brasil reconheceu a alimentação enquanto direito. Este reconhecimento foi corroborado pela edição da lei federal n. 11.346/2006 e pela promulgação da Emenda Constitucional n. 64/2010, que incluiu o Direito Humano à Alimentação Adequada (DHAA) no rol de Direitos Sociais explícitos da Constituição Federal. Apesar da normatização do DHAA, na prática, em 2022, o Brasil contava com 125,2 milhões de pessoas em insegurança alimentar, incluídas neste grupo, as mais de 33 milhões de pessoas em situação de fome, a modalidade mais grave de insegurança alimentar. Com a envergadura normativa dos diplomas citados e a crise famélica observada no país, aventou-se a hipótese de que haveria uma grande quantidade de demandas envolvendo o DHAA no âmbito do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) – órgão jurisdicional responsável pela uniformização interpretativa da legislação federal. Aventou-se ainda que o enfoque interpretativo do DHAA na jurisprudência do STJ era primordialmente orientado para o enfrentamento da fome. Pautada em metodologia descritiva, a partir de dados coletados diretamente da jurisprudência do STJ, analisados qualiquantitativamente, a pesquisa objetivou compreender quantas e quais foram as demandas sobre DHAA que alcançaram aquela Corte e como esta se manifestou. Concluiu-se que apenas 04 (quatro) acórdãos tratando explicitamente sobre DHAA foram proferidos pelo STJ ao longo de toda sua existência, sendo que nenhum enfocou o enfrentamento da fome, limitando o DHAA à Adequação Sanitária, isto é, à busca por alimentos livres de substâncias nocivas à saúde.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)2024-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.franca.unesp.br/index.php/estudosjuridicosunesp/article/view/449410.22171/rejunesp.v28i48.4494Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da UNESP; v. 28 n. 48 (2024): Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP; 135-156UNESP Journal of Legal Studies; Vol. 28 No. 48 (2024): Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP; 135-156Revista de Estudios Jurídicos de UNESP; Vol. 28 Núm. 48 (2024): Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP; 135-156Revue d'Études Juridiques d'UNESP; Vol. 28 No. 48 (2024): Revista de Estudos Jurídicos UNESP; 135-1562179-51771414-309710.22171/rejunesp.v28i48reponame:Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da Unesp (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.franca.unesp.br/index.php/estudosjuridicosunesp/article/view/4494/3598Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da UNESPhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEvaristo Guerra, João Marcel2025-05-09T14:07:40Zoai:ojs.franca.unesp.br:article/4494Revistahttps://periodicos.franca.unesp.br/index.php/estudosjuridicosunesp/PUBhttps://periodicos.franca.unesp.br/index.php/estudosjuridicosunesp/oairej.unesp@gmail.com2179-51771414-3097opendoar:2025-05-09T14:07:40Revista de Estudos Jurídicos da Unesp (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP)false
score 15.300724

Similar Items