Casuistry, listening and remembering: three potentially anti-colonial psychoanalytic practices
The article examines three psychoanalytic practices, casuistry, listening and remembering, that can have anti-colonial effects and challenge the universalism of Europe. While casuistry allows us to consider a cultural particularity that is irreducible to the universalist pretensions of the West, lis...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) |
| Repositorio: | Plural (Bauru) - Revista de Psicologia |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistaplural.emnuvens.com.br:article/84 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistaplural.emnuvens.com.br/prp/article/view/84 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Psicanálise anticolonialismo universalismo metapsicologia sujeito Psychoanalysis anticolonialism universalism metapsychology subject Psicoanálisis metapsicología sujeto |
| Sumario: | The article examines three psychoanalytic practices, casuistry, listening and remembering, that can have anti-colonial effects and challenge the universalism of Europe. While casuistry allows us to consider a cultural particularity that is irreducible to the universalist pretensions of the West, listening gives a place of subjects to those who have traditionally been seen as objects of European knowledge, and memory can open a space for the present of the precolonial past, thus subverting colonial temporality with its ahistorical presentism. The conclusion draws a distinction between psychoanalytic practice with its anti-colonial potential and Freudian metapsychology that inevitably corresponds to European conceptions of subjectivity, proposing to study other conceptions, such as those indigenous to America. |
|---|