PEATE por estímulo chirp em recém-nascidos: uma revisão integrativa
Purpose: to review the literature available on electrophysiological findings on ABR with chirp stimuli in newborns. Methods: articles were searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, and SciELO. Papers published in English and Portuguese between 2010 and 2020 were selected, includin...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/69277 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20222442522s http://hdl.handle.net/1843/69277 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7268-4470 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2004-2692 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-0498 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3705-9471 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Recém-nascido Potenciais evocados auditivos Tronco encefálico |
| Sumario: | Purpose: to review the literature available on electrophysiological findings on ABR with chirp stimuli in newborns. Methods: articles were searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, and SciELO. Papers published in English and Portuguese between 2010 and 2020 were selected, including those that addressed ABR with air-conduction broadband chirp stimuli in newborns, that assessed ABR with a specific frequency, and that compared ABR results with chirp and click stimuli. Articles that assessed only bone-conduction results, duplicates, literature reviews, case reports, letters, and editorials were excluded. Literature review: the search strategy resulted in nine selected articles. Four studies (44.4%) analyzed ABR wave amplitude and latency with chirp stimuli, three studies (33.3%) compared the time of ABR procedures between chirp and click stimuli, two studies (22.2%) analyzed only amplitude, and two (22.2%), verified the specificity of ABR with chirp stimuli in neonatal hearing screening. Conclusion: chirp stimuli elicit responses with greater amplitudes, lower latencies, and shorter examination time than those with click stimuli in newborns. |
|---|