A crítica ao nominalismo na filosofia de Charles Sanders Peirce
Master's dissertation with the objective of exposing Peirce's criticism to nominalism. The first chapter takes as a starting point of the controversy between Duns Scotus and Guilherme Ockham, as well as an analysis by Peirce of such dispute, proceeding with the implications of nominalism t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/23165 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23165 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Nominalismo Filosofia americana Filosofia medieval Peirce, Charles Sanders [1839-1914] - Crítica e interpretação Nominalism Philosophy, American Philosophy, Medieval Peirce, Charles Sanders [1839-1914] - Criticism and interpretation CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
| Sumario: | Master's dissertation with the objective of exposing Peirce's criticism to nominalism. The first chapter takes as a starting point of the controversy between Duns Scotus and Guilherme Ockham, as well as an analysis by Peirce of such dispute, proceeding with the implications of nominalism to the history of philosophy. The second chapter deals with Peirce's phenomenology and scientific metaphysics, highlighting the difference between the categories of firstness, secondness and thirdness and nominalist’s view that deny universals. The third chapter deals with the evolutionary, synechist and ty-chist views of Peirce, highlighting Peirce's rejection of the denial of of continuity in favor of an evolutionary cosmology, considering how Peirce sees an oposition between this view and nominalism. In the fourth chapter, we discuss an opposition between modern science and nominalism, with the implications to semiotics, logic and scientific method that this entails. We conclude by affirming the centrality of Peirce's critique of nominal-ism within his work |
|---|