O olhar da comissão assessora de avaliação sobre o enade da área de pedagogia - 2005
This paper presents the work conducted between May and November of 2005 by the Evaluation Assistance Committee of the National Student Performance Exam (ENADE) in the field of Pedagogy. The purpose of the Committee is to present guidelines, objectives and other specifications that contribute to the...
| Autores: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2008 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211588 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1414-40772008000300004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211588 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Higher education evaluation ENADE Pedagogy Avaliação da educação superior Pedagogia |
| Sumario: | This paper presents the work conducted between May and November of 2005 by the Evaluation Assistance Committee of the National Student Performance Exam (ENADE) in the field of Pedagogy. The purpose of the Committee is to present guidelines, objectives and other specifications that contribute to the construction of evaluation tools to be provided to in-coming and graduating students who participate in the 2005 Exam. The text begins with a brief historic recapitulation of the trajectory of Pedagogy Programs in Brazil, in legal and situational terms. The analysis emphasizes the context of these Programs in 2005, one that is marked by the absence of properly approved National Curriculum Guidelines. Given this fact the Assistance Commission addressed the impact of the various elements in this situation and the discussions and tensions that still mark the daily life of the Pedagogy Programs, considering the propositions of the national movement in light of the determinations of SINAES. The guiding parameters of the matrixes for the construction of the instruments - the knowledge and abilities required - are based on the definitions of the profile of the pedagogue and of the fields of activity consecrated in the documents approved by the representative entities in the field, which have guided the curricular organization of most of the operating programs. Respecting the principles defined by SINAES and ENADE for the establishment of a national evaluation policy for Higher Education, the Commission guided all of the phases of its work by the concept of evaluation as an instrument of articulation of knowledge, to encourage mutual cooperation and solidary educational practices. Considered as a public and not only technical issue, which is supported by an ethical and political commitment in defense of the public and social character of the university, the evaluation has consequences that go beyond this institution and has important repercussions for society. |
|---|