Comparison of incisors changes in skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions treated with conventional orthognathic surgery and surgery-first approach

Objective: This study aimed to compare the changes of maxillary and mandibular incisors in skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions patients treated with conventional orthognathic surgery (COS) and surgery-first approach (SFA). Material and methods: From the Class II malocclusion sample: COS gr...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Huilca, Gonzalo Paúl Velásquez
Formato: tesis doctoral
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Repositorio:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:teses.usp.br:tde-16102024-115021
Acesso em linha:https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-16102024-115021/
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Cirurgia de benefício antecipado
Cirurgia ortognática convencional
Class III malocclusion
Conventional orthognathic surgery
Incisivo
Incisor
Má oclusão de Classe II esquelética
Má oclusão de Classe III
Skeletal Class II malocclusion
Surgery-first
Descrição
Resumo:Objective: This study aimed to compare the changes of maxillary and mandibular incisors in skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions patients treated with conventional orthognathic surgery (COS) and surgery-first approach (SFA). Material and methods: From the Class II malocclusion sample: COS group comprised 23 patients (10 males, 13 females) with a mean pretreatment age of 27.64 ± 8.61 years, treated during a mean period of 2.98 ± 1.33 years. SFA group comprised 23 patients (7 males, 16 females) with a mean pretreatment age of 30.33 ± 8.30 years, treated during a mean period of 1.61 ± 1.18 years. From the Class III malocclusion sample: COS group comprised 23 patients (13 males, 10 females) with a mean pretreatment age of 23.81 ± 8.15 years, treated during a mean period of 3.25 ± 1.29 years. SFA group comprised 23 patients (9 males, 14 females) with a mean pretreatment age of 25.53 ± 6.88 years, treated during a mean period of 1.34 ± 0.70 years. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained at pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2). Intergroup comparisons were performed with independent T-test. Results: From the Class II malocclusion sample: In the intergroup comparison between treatment changes, the FMA and LAFH decreased significantly more with the treatment in the COS group than in the SFA group. The mandibular incisors were significantly more intruded with treatment in the COS group than in SFA group. From the Class III malocclusion sample: In the intergroup comparison between treatment changes, the maxillary incisors were significantly more palatally inclinated in the SFA group than in the COS group. The interincisal angle was significantly reduced in the COS group and significantly increased in the SFA group. Conclusions: There was no difference in maxillary and mandibular incisor changes in skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions patients treated with conventional orthognathic surgery and surgery-first approach.