Mudanças climáticas na bacia do rio São Francisco: uma análise para precipitação e temperatura

Precipitation and temperature projections from global models, made available through the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), and actually used in the AR5 by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC-AR5), are assessed here for São Francisco River Basin. RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Silveira, Cleiton da Silva, Souza Filho, Francisco de Assis de, Martins, Eduardo Sávio Passos Rodrigues, Oliveira, Juliana Lima, Costa, Alexandre Cunha, Nobrega, Marcio Tavares, Souza, Saulo Aires de, Silva, Robson Franklin Vieira
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/55041
Acceso en línea:http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/55041
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Mudanças climáticas
Bacia do Rio São Francisco
IPCC-AR5
Climate change
Descripción
Sumario:Precipitation and temperature projections from global models, made available through the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), and actually used in the AR5 by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC-AR5), are assessed here for São Francisco River Basin. RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 are considered througout the period 2011 to 2100. Incidentally, global models are evaluated concerning their representativity related to 1961-2000 climatology from Brazilian National Meteorological Institute (INMET) data. Two indexes were evaluated: correlation and square mean error. The analisys of projections was performed through the assessment of yearly average values of 30 years period (2011-2040, 2041-2070 e 2071-2100). Additionally to evaluate trends and variability it was considered 10 year moving averages, linear regression and Mann-Kendall-Sen method. Approximately 28% analyzed models do not capture the seasonal precipitation reliably. All models present positive trend for temperature, and despite of divergence on precipitation, the models projected anomalies between -20 and 20 for each time-slice for this variable.