Comparação entre a imagem radiografica interproximal convencional e a digital direta na detecção de cáries proximais

The purpose this study was to evaluate the accuracy of proximal caries detectíon comparing enhanced and unenhanced Sidexis CCD-based digital image with Ektaspeed Plus and lnsight films. Fifty-two extracted teeth posterior were imaged under identical standardized geometric and exposure condítions. Fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Araujo, Elaine Aparecida Félix de [UNESP]
Tipo de recurso: tesis de maestría
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2001
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/154663
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11449/154663
http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/cathedra/19-06-2017/000138146.pdf
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Radiography, Dental
Dental caries
Radiografia - Qualidade da imagem
Radiografia dentária
Cárie dentária
Imagens digitais
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose this study was to evaluate the accuracy of proximal caries detectíon comparing enhanced and unenhanced Sidexis CCD-based digital image with Ektaspeed Plus and lnsight films. Fifty-two extracted teeth posterior were imaged under identical standardized geometric and exposure condítions. Four observes, using six point confidence scale, rated 104 proximal surfaces for the presence or absence of carious lesions by means of four image modalities: a) Ektaspeed Plus films; b) INSIGHT films; c) unenhanced Sidexis displays; d) obsever enhanced. The real pattern was determined by microscopy analysis of sections. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were generated analyzed with Kappa the according interobservers. The results indicated that there wasn't significant difference between unenhanced Sidexis and film images (P >0,05)