The control of conventionality: analysis in comparative law

IN THE ALMONACID CASE (2006), THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ENOUNCED FOR THE FIRST TIME THE DOCTRINE OF THE CONTROL OF CONVENTIONALITY. THE CONTROL OF CONVENTIONALITY HAS PROPELLED A SIGNIFICANT ACADEMIC DEBATE, ESPECIALLY BETWEEN LATIN-AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLARS. ONE QUESTION THAT...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Aguilar Cavallo, Gonzalo
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2013
País:Brasil
Recursos:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
Repositório:Revista Direito GV
Idioma:espanhol
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/21451
Acesso em linha:https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/21451
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:CONTROL OF CONVENTIONALITY
CONTROL OF CONSTITUTIONALITY
HUMAN RIGHTS
JUDGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS
INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD
CONTROL DE CONSTITUCIONALIDAD
DERECHOS HUMANOS
JUEZ DE DERECHOS HUMANOS
CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS
Descrição
Resumo:IN THE ALMONACID CASE (2006), THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ENOUNCED FOR THE FIRST TIME THE DOCTRINE OF THE CONTROL OF CONVENTIONALITY. THE CONTROL OF CONVENTIONALITY HAS PROPELLED A SIGNIFICANT ACADEMIC DEBATE, ESPECIALLY BETWEEN LATIN-AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLARS. ONE QUESTION THAT ARISES IN THIS SCENARIO IS ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONTROL OF CONSTITUTIONALITY AND THE CONTROL OF CONVENTIONALITY. THE COMPARATIVE LAW BRINGS ARGUMENTS AND CRITERIA TO ADDRESS THIS QUESTION.