Topical uterine cervix treatment with trichloracetic acid 85% in CIN I, CIN II and CIN III
Context: It is know that cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is na early warning of cervical cancer and precocious identification of theselesions indicates a favorable prognosis. Around 20% evolve towards a more serious CIN, yet the Human Papiloma Virus (HPV) is the main riskfactor. Nowadays, a...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2003 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Sociedade Brasileira de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis |
| Repositorio: | DST (Niterói. Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.bjstd.org:article/459 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.bjstd.org/revista/article/view/459 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | HPV NIC tratamento ácido tricloroacético CIN treatment trichloracetic acid |
| Sumario: | Context: It is know that cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is na early warning of cervical cancer and precocious identification of theselesions indicates a favorable prognosis. Around 20% evolve towards a more serious CIN, yet the Human Papiloma Virus (HPV) is the main riskfactor. Nowadays, a semestral Papanicolaou smear (Pap) follow-up is carried out, during a period of two years; and when there is anymodification, a more detailed inquiry is performed. Objective: The aim of this study is to recommend a new following to CIN with colposcope,eradicating HPV. Methods: A clinical study in a private clinic in Pelotas – RS was carried out in patients who presented a suggestive Pap smearwith HPV and negative colposcope. All the 68 patients were put through three uterine cervix applications with trichloracetic acid 85% (TAA85%) weekly and then reevaluated with a periodic Pap smear. Results: the age of the patients ranged from 18 to 55 years old, and the majorprevalence of CIN grade I was the most prevalent (66,2%), followed by the grade II (22%). After the treatment with TAA 85% only one patientdid not show some response on the Pap smear. Conclusion: It was verified that with this procedure a normalization of the Pap smear hasoccurred, thus enabling a better evolution of these lesions. |
|---|