TWO NOTIONS OF HISTORICAL A PRIORI: TRADITION AND ARCHIVE
This article discuss two different approaches used to think historical a priori. On the one hand, when Husserl speaks about historical a priori, he refers to the tradition – one way of stating that history of thought is continuous and follows a common spirit. It implies, at the same time, that the t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
| Repositorio: | Revista philósophos |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/27878 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistas.ufg.br/philosophos/article/view/27878 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | historical a priori tradition archive episteme archaeology a priori histórico tradição arquivo arqueologia. |
| Resumo: | This article discuss two different approaches used to think historical a priori. On the one hand, when Husserl speaks about historical a priori, he refers to the tradition – one way of stating that history of thought is continuous and follows a common spirit. It implies, at the same time, that the tradition, despite being a discourse that precedes the subject, clearly to exist depends on a discursive subject at his present activity. On other, in Foucault’s proposal, historical a priori will be saw from what would make possible the appearance of multiple statements in a given era (archive). Therefore, it is all about a history not guided by subjectivity, but by the discourse itself. What remains of these two conceptions is to know the status of mathematics and physical sciences: they would be a model or an exception? |
|---|