TEXTUAL REVIEW AND MASTER THESIS PRODUCTION: A REFLETION ABOUT THE PLAGIARISM RYSK
The textual review is one of the textual production stages, carried out by the professional reviewer. Thus, the objective of this paper is to verify if the textual reviewer is sticking to the plagiarism question and, if so, on what criteria he/she is based. We select a master thesis in a review stag...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) |
| Repositorio: | Revista (Con)Textos Linguísticos (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.ufes.br:article/28809 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.ufes.br/contextoslinguisticos/article/view/28809 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Textual review Textual production Master thesis genre Plagiarism Revisão textual Produção textual Gênero dissertação de mestrado Plágio |
| Resumo: | The textual review is one of the textual production stages, carried out by the professional reviewer. Thus, the objective of this paper is to verify if the textual reviewer is sticking to the plagiarism question and, if so, on what criteria he/she is based. We select a master thesis in a review stage and we cut interactions excerpts. Theoretically, we discuss about the discursive genres on Bakhtin (2011), about textual review on Oliveira (2016) and about the plagiarism practice we based on the Law nº 9.610, of copyrights. Through analysis, we verify that the reviewer identifies information which needs to be properly referenced, in order to avoid the plagiarism risk in academic works. |
|---|