Conceitualismo e lida absorvida: o debate entre John McDowell e Hubert Dreyfus
This thesis examined the so-called McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. The first chapter presents McDowell´s conceptualist thesis. The second chapter deals with the debate itself, having as background an analysis of the way Dreyfus reads phenomenologists such as Martin Heidegger and Maurice Merleau-Ponty in hi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/BUOS-B76FVG |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-B76FVG |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Não Conceitualismo Lida Absorvida Dreyfus Conceitualismo Normatividade McDowell McDowell, John, 1942- Dreyfus, Hubert L Filosofia |
| Sumario: | This thesis examined the so-called McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. The first chapter presents McDowell´s conceptualist thesis. The second chapter deals with the debate itself, having as background an analysis of the way Dreyfus reads phenomenologists such as Martin Heidegger and Maurice Merleau-Ponty in his attack on McDowell. In addition, it presents the way McDowell provides a response to Dreyfus based on the idea that concepts are in constant operation in perceptual experience. Contra Dreyfus, the third chapter presents conceptualist readings of Heidegger´s philosophy, as well as it strives to provide an approximation between McDowell and the German philosopher on the basis of the notion of normativity. We conclude our work showing certain possibilities of a middle ground to the debate. |
|---|