Development and evaluation of extruded protein snacks added

This study aimed to develop an extruded protein snack added to lentil flour (L) and textured soy protein (S) and to evaluate the developed formulations sensorially, physicochemically, and physically. Five formulations were prepared: C (100% flour corn (C)), S40% (60% flour corn and 40% soybean), LS2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: GOMES, Karolynne Sousa, BERWIAN, Gabrielle Fusiger, TIEPO, Caroline Balesiefer Vicenzi, COLLA, Luciane Maria
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:Brasil
Institución:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
Repositorio:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.fst.emnuvens.com.br:article/79
Acceso en línea:https://fstjournal.com.br/revista/article/view/79
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:extruded snacks
protein
soy
lentil
Descripción
Sumario:This study aimed to develop an extruded protein snack added to lentil flour (L) and textured soy protein (S) and to evaluate the developed formulations sensorially, physicochemically, and physically. Five formulations were prepared: C (100% flour corn (C)), S40% (60% flour corn and 40% soybean), LS20% (80% flour corn, 15% soybean, and 5% lentil), LS15% (85% corn, 7.5% soybean, and 7.5% lentil), and LS10% (90% corn, 7% soybean, and 3% lentil). The research was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade de Passo Fundo (55484622.2.0000.5342). Seventy untrained tasters participated in the acceptance test, where the LS15% and LS10% formulations were the most accepted (83.5 and 80.2%, respectively). In the physicochemical characterization, it was observed that all formulations improve nutritional quality, with a significant increase in protein content (11–23%) in all formulations. Physically, the formulations with corn replacement rates showed higher resistance and lower crunchiness. Furthermore, all formulations showed higher water activity (0.55–0.61 aw) than the standard sample (0.34 aw). Therefore, the incorporation of lentils and soy flours benefited the nutritional quality of the snacks but negatively affected their physical parameters and sensory acceptability.