Totem and Taboo: a Freud’s “psychoanalytical semiology”?
This paper focus is a review about the Freudian issues about a psychoanalytical semiology and a research method of lecture review. The hypothesis that “Totem and Taboo” is the first Freud’s psychoanalytical semiology has been discussed. Though Freud did not use such a term, it was argued that Freud...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2007 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
| Repositorio: | Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6901 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6901 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Freud semiologia psicanalítica revisão de literatura psicanálise totem tabu |
| Sumario: | This paper focus is a review about the Freudian issues about a psychoanalytical semiology and a research method of lecture review. The hypothesis that “Totem and Taboo” is the first Freud’s psychoanalytical semiology has been discussed. Though Freud did not use such a term, it was argued that Freud did in this book the psychoanalytical semiology of the two signs: “Totem” and “Taboo”. This paper concluded that in order to do a semiological study, it would be necessary to emphasize the analysis of the universal language patterns which reveal the deepest human nature and the unconscious psychism. Such analysis should be done in two different phases: the first one, seeking those patterns within the totems and myths; the second one, seeking the same patterns within the taboos and religions. This kind of study requires writings survey, and justifies the use of literature review as psychoanalytical method in. |
|---|