Estudo da precisão diagnóstica do artrômetro KT1000TM na lesões do ligamento cruzado anterior
The main objective of this study was to verify the sensitiveness of the Electronic Arthrometer KT-1000TM in detecting ACL injuries. Thirty-six patients with knee sprain history and clinical tests compatible to ACL injury were evaluated. Group 1 was composed of 18 patients evaluated within less than...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2005 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/2348 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522005000400004 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/2348 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Knee Anterior cruciate ligament Arthroscopy Joelho Ligamento cruzado anterior Artroscopia |
| Sumario: | The main objective of this study was to verify the sensitiveness of the Electronic Arthrometer KT-1000TM in detecting ACL injuries. Thirty-six patients with knee sprain history and clinical tests compatible to ACL injury were evaluated. Group 1 was composed of 18 patients evaluated within less than four weeks after the sprain episode. Group 2 (two) was formed by 18 patients evaluated within more than 4 (four) weeks after the sprain episode. Both Groups were submitted to arthrometric (KT-1000TM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MR) evaluation. After the analysis of data obtained from imaging and arthrometric evaluations, the patients were submitted to arthroscopic procedures for injury evaluation and treatment, enabling the comparison of arthroscopic findings to the results of arthrometry and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The diagnostic accuracy of the arthrometer KT-1000 TM was 100% for both groups, with the most sensible test regarding the presence of ACL injury being the Maximum Manual Traction Test. The diagnostic accuracy of the magnetic resonance imaging test was 94.4% for Group 1 and 100% for Group 2. |
|---|