Deve a integridade vincular o poder legislativo? Uma análise das críticas de Andrei Marmor à integridade legislativa em Ronald Dworkin
This essay intends to analyze the possibility of binding the legislature to the ideal of integrity defended by Ronald Dworkin. As this author asserts, political integrity should be applied both to the legislature to the judiciary, and in both cases, it is based on coherence. Against this view, we pr...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/38968 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v62i1.47835 http://hdl.handle.net/1843/38968 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4493-0088 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Dworkin Integridade Legislação Andrei Marmor Dworkin, Ronald, 1931-2013 Marmor, Andrei Poder legislativo |
| Sumario: | This essay intends to analyze the possibility of binding the legislature to the ideal of integrity defended by Ronald Dworkin. As this author asserts, political integrity should be applied both to the legislature to the judiciary, and in both cases, it is based on coherence. Against this view, we present Andrei Marmor’s opinion. Although Marmor does not deny the importance of coherence and integrity, he claims that the legislative branch cannot be bound by this political value. Finally, we introduce Jeremy Waldron’s view, which indirectly responds to Marmor and offers a defense of integrity. |
|---|