THE ARGUMENTATION OF VEJA AND CARTACAPITAL ABOUT DILMA ROUSSEFF’S IMPEACHMENT
This article analyzes, based on the argumentation theory (BRETON, 1999, 2012), points of divergence in the coverage of Veja and CartaCapital on the impeachment of ex-president of Brazil Dilma Rousseff. Therefore, it starts from the concept of political actor (BORRAT, 1989) to understand the strategi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Animus (Santa Maria. Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/63897 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/animus/article/view/63897 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Political actor Argumentation Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment. Ator político Argumentação Impeachment Dilma Rousseff |
| Sumario: | This article analyzes, based on the argumentation theory (BRETON, 1999, 2012), points of divergence in the coverage of Veja and CartaCapital on the impeachment of ex-president of Brazil Dilma Rousseff. Therefore, it starts from the concept of political actor (BORRAT, 1989) to understand the strategic way in which the media works and from the argumentation to understand the possibility of building different perspectives for the same event. As a conclusion, it is observed that the magazines, understood as agents of socialization (BORRAT, 1989), employ argumentative strategies such as community and authority that reinforce their versions of what happened. |
|---|