Abortion Once Again: a response to Feser, Goodwin, Mosquito, Sadowsky, Vance and Watkins
Only a libertarian would think to base an analysis of the abortion controversy on private property rights. The present paper does just that. On that basis, it concludes that evictionism is the only policy compatible with libertarianism. This essay then uses this analysis to criticize the views on t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/50328 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/50328 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Law; Constitucional Law Pro-life; pro-choice; evictionism; libertarianism; abortion. Abortion |
| Sumario: | Only a libertarian would think to base an analysis of the abortion controversy on private property rights. The present paper does just that. On that basis, it concludes that evictionism is the only policy compatible with libertarianism. This essay then uses this analysis to criticize the views on this subject of five scholars associated with this political philosophy: Feser, Goodwin, Mosquito, Sadowsky, Vance and Watkins. |
|---|