THEY, THE BASTARDS! OR MANIFEST TO THINK OF A LOVING CURRICULUM
In this manifesto we defend the idea that it is possible to think about a curriculum for Environmental Education that goes beyond, that throws us to other movements, that takes us out of paralysis, that only makes complain and shout slogans for man, but that create forces active against reactive for...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
| Repositorio: | Revista e-Curriculum |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44940 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/curriculum/article/view/44940 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Currículo Educação Ambiental Resistência Linhas de fuga Amor. Curriculum Environmental education Resistance Escape lines Love. Plan de estudios Educación ambiental Resistencia Líneas de escape Amor |
| Sumario: | In this manifesto we defend the idea that it is possible to think about a curriculum for Environmental Education that goes beyond, that throws us to other movements, that takes us out of paralysis, that only makes complain and shout slogans for man, but that create forces active against reactive forces. The idea is to do a conceptual approximation exercise between Antonio Negri concepts of resistance and Gilles Deleuze escape lines to think of a curriculum for Environmental Education as resistance through those lives that we look to be smaller, useless. So what we want is to invent; think of trailing lines; crack the classic lines inscribed in the sendimentalized curriculum. Perhaps it is time to think of love as a space of creation and resistance to imagine another environmental education. Think of an environmental education that enhances experience, life. Create escape lines across the ocean, looking for other ways to exist, to act when talking about the environment. The idea is not to change paradigms, but to get out of them. |
|---|