Oscilação do centro de pressão plantar de indivíduos com e sem entorse de tornozelo

Introduction: The most common mechanism of ligament ankle injury is by plantar flexion associated with inversion, known as ankle sprain. The lesion may impair neuromuscular control of the individual, changing postural control and increase the chances of the individual suffer relapses. Objective: To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Saito, André Kenzo [UNIFESP]
Tipo de recurso: tesis de maestría
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2014
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/46230
Acceso en línea:https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=1994109
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/46230
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Ankle
Sprain
Plantar
Pressure
Postural balance
Entorse
Tornozelo
Pressão

Equilíbrio postural
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: The most common mechanism of ligament ankle injury is by plantar flexion associated with inversion, known as ankle sprain. The lesion may impair neuromuscular control of the individual, changing postural control and increase the chances of the individual suffer relapses. Objective: To evaluate whether there are differences as to the oscillation of the center of pressure in planting one foot between individuals with and without ankle sprain. Methods: 60 subjects (14 male volleyball athletes, 14 female volleyball athletes and 28 non-athletes), between 18 and 23 years old, with and without ankle sprain were tested in single-leg stance with eyes opened and eyes closed on baropodometer. The oscillatory pattern was captured by baropodometer (MatScan System Version 6.60 (Teckscan Inc., Boston, MA, USA) and transmitted to the computer. FAOS questionnaire was used to assess subjective functionality of individuals. For statistical analysis were used repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey post-hoc test, independent samples t-Student test, paired t-Student test, and KruskalWallis test. Results: Athletes without sprain have higher oscillations compared to athletes and non-athletes with sprains. Non-athletes without sprain have smaller oscillation compared to athletes and non-athletes with sprain Individuals without sprain have higher scores in FAOS compared to individuals with sprains. Conclusion: Athletes and non-athletes have different oscillatory patterns and it is not possible to compare these populations.