Variation in verbal agreement of “nós” in the present and past tense in regular verbs of the 1st and 2nd conjugation: productive in Southeast of Paraná?
The theme of this article is the morphemic variation in P4 (we) in regular verbs of the 1 st and 2 nd conjugation. We aim to describe and analyze the canonical and non-canonical forms – such as -a-mo(s) versus e-mo(s), and -e-mo(s) versus -i-mo(s) – in the southeast of Paraná. Therefore, we are ba...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
| Repositorio: | Signótica (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/41083 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/41083 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Sociolinguistics Linguistic variation Southeast of Paraná Verbal agreement P4. Sociolingüística Variación lingüística Sudeste del Paraná Concordancia verbal Sociolinguística Variação Linguística Sudeste do Paraná Concordância Verbal P4 |
| Sumario: | The theme of this article is the morphemic variation in P4 (we) in regular verbs of the 1 st and 2 nd conjugation. We aim to describe and analyze the canonical and non-canonical forms – such as -a-mo(s) versus e-mo(s), and -e-mo(s) versus -i-mo(s) – in the southeast of Paraná. Therefore, we are based our research on Labov (2008 [1972]; 1994) and Weinreich, Labov e Herzog (2006 [1968]), Amaral ([1920]), Câmara Junior ([1970]), Castilho (1992) and others. The research used a qualitative methodology, analyzing spoken and written speech data and writing in Irati and Mallet towns, in the southeast of Paraná. From the results, our hypothesis of non-canonical variant productivity in this region was confirmed. |
|---|