THE "MONSTRUOUS CONDITION": THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FORMAL CONCEPT OF CONSTITUENT POWER IN CONTEMPORANEITY AND ITS IMPLICATION IN FREEDOM AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
The consolidation of the democratic constituent processes characteristic ofrevolutionary liberalism from the end of the 18th century and the beginning of the 19thcentury generated the conservative reaction of the social and economic forces that setthemselves the objective of stopping the emancipator...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Abya Yala (Brasília) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46205 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/abya/article/view/46205 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Poder Constituinte Liberalismo conservador Nominalismo Soberania Compartilhada Constituent power, conservative liberalism nominalism shared sovereignty constituted constituent power Poder constituyente liberalismo conservador nominalismo soberanía compartida poder constituyente constituido |
| Sumario: | The consolidation of the democratic constituent processes characteristic ofrevolutionary liberalism from the end of the 18th century and the beginning of the 19thcentury generated the conservative reaction of the social and economic forces that setthemselves the objective of stopping the emancipatory character of the constituentpower concept. Among these efforts stands out the deployment of the formal concept ofconstituent power, conceived as a "monstrous condition" in terms of Donoso Cortés,intended to chain the constituent power within the theoretical framework of legality andexceptionality, which had a negative impact on progress of freedom and social justice.Three creations stood out in the formal concept of constituent power: sharedsovereignty, nominalism of constitutional rights, and “constituted constituent power”.The work critically analyzes these arguments that feed, even today, broad doctrinaldebates about the nature of the constituent power. |
|---|